Ketchum developer Jeff Pfaeffle was
handed a denial on his annexation application Monday, by the Hailey City Council
as part of an annexation application in favor of bringing property in the
county known as the Justus Ranch into the city. Extending city limits along
Broadford Road, the development to be called "Colorado Gulch Preserve," would
have brought 180 acres into the city with about 65 residential lots and
three-quarters of a mile of public access on the Big Wood River linked to Heagle
Park and Colorado Gulch Road.
Ranch annexation denied by Hailey
Riverfront future passed to county by
city council
By MATT FURBER
Express Staff Writer
After brief deliberation, the Hailey City
Council denied the application of Justus Ranch developers for annexation of
riverfront property into the city of Hailey. The property is located west of
Broadford Road and Airport West.
A panel of advocates for Jeff Pfaeffle,
the project leader, presented a plan for 65 residential building lots and a
riparian access corridor to be called Colorado Gulch Preserve. The plan included
a gift of a public easement to the community of about three-quarters of a mile
of property fronting the Big Wood River south of Heagle Park in Hailey.
However, complexities surrounding the
project caused the council to balk at the challenge set by the developer.
Problems included a letter from Blaine County Commissioners stating that much of
the land in the proposed application was outside of Hailey’s agreed upon "area
of impact" and therefore ineligible for annexation.
Wood River Land Trust Executive Director
Scott Boettger said the application created a dilemma for his organization.
Though the organization would like to see river access protected for the
community, "... because of the extent of development being proposed in the
floodplain, wetlands and riparian corridor we can not support this application
as shown."
City councilwoman Martha Burke seconded
Boettger’s comments and explained that it was difficult for her to deny the
application.
"It’s hard to turn down such a gem," she
said, hinting at the dilemma for the city. "The reason we are here is ... a
desire to protect that corridor and access. The very fact that it took some very
skilled people (to put the project together) leads me to believe it is not to be
subdivided in the city."
Burke said, however, she supported plans
for community housing and that the engineers supporting Pfaeffle made an
excellent presentation. Boettger said that although he would like to see less
development near the river, he did support the density concept laid out by the
developer.
Mayor Susan McBryant asked the council and
public to focus comment on the overall appropriateness of the project for
annexation into the city. The Hailey Planning and Zoning Commission would
evaluate details about the layout of the project if annexation were accepted,
she said.
However, the council decided not to pursue
the issue any further.
"I am really disappointed that this goal
to partner up to develop the river corridor isn’t possible," Pfaeffle said. "I
was surprised at the haste of the decision given (Mayor Susan McBryant’s)
admonishment to consider the information they were given."
City Councilman Don Keirn said county
zoning was likely the best protection for the property and voiced concern that
the complexity of managing ground water seepage on the property could cause
problems for the city in the future.
Keirn said if he bought property in the
subdivision and it suddenly had standing water on it he would "raise hell with
somebody, and I would start with the guy that sold me the property."
Engineers for Pfaeffle seemed confident
that they could engineer solutions to the hydrological complexities of the
property located in the flood plain, which according to the their review is not
as susceptible to flood related problems as the Della View subdivision where
homes are located directly in the flood way.
"I would hope in a year’s time all this
material could be fully digested and the city would try to pull up their
sleeves," Pfaeffle said.
Pfaeffle added that the application could
have been moved in a similar direction to an application submitted for
annexation by Cutter’s Ranch developers northeast of Hailey, which is currently
being reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
"I feel that the river offer is certainly
more valuable than anything else the city is considering," Pfaeffle said. "I am
surprised the council is not ready to look more deeply into the possibility of
connecting Colorado Gulch with Heagle Park without a real try."
City Councilman Rick Davis said one of the
elements of the application missing for him was a fiscal impact study of the
project and the possibility that three other properties could be facing the
possibility of forced annexation as a result.
Pfaeffle said he did sympathize with the
challenges of development pressure currently facing the city, seconding comments
made by Justus Ranch neighbor, and avalanche forecaster Doug Abromeit, who
listed several points that needed to be addressed for him to support the
project.
"I urge the city to postpone consideration
until a definitive annexation policy is complete (to) give us all a road map to
follow," Abromeit said. "I applaud the initial step towards a good development."
Abromeit added that there is much work to
be done in designing an appropriate development, especially where water is
concerned.
"Following a heavy snow year, the only dry
areas are the very high areas," he said.
The Justus Ranch property has an
irrigation canal running through the lower portion of the property near the
river. Architect Richard Emik designed the initial concept for the property,
which commits development to the higher portions of the property with building
envelopes outside sensitive flood plain areas.
"The possibility really was through the
annexation, Pfaeffle said. "I’m proud of the effort we put into this. We made a
big effort on behalf of the community ... maybe in the future once the city
irons out its annexation procedures something can occur."