What plan for Iraq?
Are we in, or are we out?
When it comes to Iraq, this is the $65
billion question to which both Americans and Iraqis want and need an answer.
President George W. Bush repeats his
mantra daily, "We will stay the course."
But what is the course?
The Bush Administration says it will turn
over control to a new Iraqi government in June. Beyond that, the administration
looks like a deer in the headlights, surprised and frozen by the unexpected.
Less than a month before the handoff, it’s
still unclear just who or what that government will be, if it will be or if it
can survive.
America is now embroiled in what may be
the most devastating public relations debacle in its history. Photographs of
American soldiers humiliating and abusing hooded and naked Iraqi prisoners have
shaken the world’s confidence in America’s ability to rebuild Iraq. The
revolting photographs have also rocked confidence in how President Bush has
handled Iraq.
A new report released by the International
Committee of the Red Cross found that mistreatment of prisoners was not limited
to Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad, where the photos were taken. The report says
that such abuses were widespread and routine.
Ironically, the same day the report was
released, President Bush said that the nation owes Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld a "debt of gratitude" instead of a pink slip. We wonder.
Nothing in post-war Iraq has gone as
predicted. After Saddam and his Republican Guards fled, President Bush said that
peace and democracy would flourish. What has ensued couldn’t contrast more with
that rosy picture.
Clerics-come-lately have organized
insurgents to fight Americans, apparently because they want to institute their
own oppressive religious regimes. Insurgents now claim Fallujah, where Americans
voluntarily turned over control to Iraqis after American contractors were killed
and publicly dismembered, as a great victory.
The Shiites and the Sunnis, who hate only
Americans more than they hate one another, continue their centuries-old blood
feuds in their spare time when they’re not taking potshots at Americans.
Moderate Iraqis have not stepped into the
middle of the fray to help lead the way to peace. Most are hunkered down with no
idea who may emerge to govern Iraq. And, it’s hard to blame them.
America is in for a long haul. It must be.
We’ve been in for two years, and will probably be there for twelve. There is no
graceful, easy or bloodless way out.
It’s tempting to want to leave and let
Iraqis deal with the aftermath. But Pol Pot’s shadow looms large over that idea.
When the U.S. fled from Vietnam, Pol Pot’s brutal dictatorship took hold in
bordering Cambodia and the killing fields were piled high with the skulls of
ordinary people. If America leaves, Iraq can expect a similar fate.
America’s departure could also give
courage to terrorists who will find welcome and recruits in a divided Iraq.
Military strategists close to the Bush
administration are now coming forward to say that the president led the nation
into Iraq with no plan for the worst case scenarios.
It’s time someone in leadership came up
with one. Delivering it tomorrow would not be too soon.