Re-fighting the wrong war
A generation too late, the Vietnam
War has become a central issue for the Kerry and Bush presidential
camps, while real problems touching American homes are swept aside.
As they’ve done before to
certified war heroes Sen. John McCain and triple combat amputee Sen. Max
Cleland, Republicans belittle John Kerry as falling short of heroism and
military smarts (a Silver Star, a Bronze Star and three Purple Hearts
aren’t enough?). The public relations machine has been working overtime
pouring out meaningless speculation and endless drivel about whether
Kerry threw medals or ribbons over a fence to protest the Vietnam War.
Taking umbrage, Kerry
understandably counterattacked with stinging questions of President
Bush’s 1970s no-show for Air National Guard duty and Vice President
Cheney’s five draft deferments.
Then, New Jersey Sen. Frank
Lautenberg, a Democrat, grabbed the headlines when he used time on the
Senate floor to call Vice President Dick Cheney the nation’s "lead
chickenhawk." He conducted an anatomy lesson and used a mawkish poster
to explain that a chicken hawk has the look of a hawk, but the spine of
a chicken.
Yet, all of this is sheer
irrelevance when trying to measure who’s best equipped to cope with
deepening crises in Iraq and an economy triggering joblessness, higher
energy costs, a federal deficit out of control and troubling evidence of
abuses to civil liberties, and which candidate has plausible solutions.
Sen. McCain, who has a justified
resentment of Bush campaign mudslinging in the 2000 campaign, rose on
the Senate floor this week to wisely plead for a cease fire of candidate
bomb-throwing and more attention to genuine affairs of state.
McCain probably is virtuously
unrealistic. The nature of modern politics is to draw blood, create
angry sound bites, divide rather than unify. High-minded debate is
regarded by backroom campaign strategists as a turnoff with no headline
sizzle.
America has embraced policies
that’ll change the U.S. lifestyle for generations. The nation has a war
on its hands, a debt load and deficit that grows while traditional
public services shrink. It faces questions of how much freedom Americans
should sacrifice in an age of terrorism and whether volunteer military
service is sufficient without a draft to continue war in Iraq for years
to come.
Dissecting who did or said what as
young men 30 years ago is utterly inane for weighing what the incumbent
president and his challenger can do as grown men with today’s crises.