Evolution and creationism and
the environment
Commentary by DICK DORWORTH
Polls are a bit like statistics in
that the hard numbers of their conclusions are seldom as hard or
delineated as they might seem at first, easy glance. The reasons for
this are beyond the scope of this column, but they are available to
anyone who chooses to investigate them. Still, polls and statistics do
indicate something. That is, while they are neither definitive nor
sacrosanct, they are not without value.
A series of recent polls seem to
indicate that somewhere between 28 percent and 47 percent of Americans
think that the theory of evolution is a better approach to an
understanding of life on earth than a belief in creationism. If the
polls are close to correct, this means that somewhere between more than
half to more than two-thirds of Americans do not believe in evolution.
To those of us who view creationism as something akin to a professed or
real belief in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, virgin birth, the Easter
Bunny, infallibility and weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, this is
astonishing.
Perhaps we shouldn’t be so
surprised. Other polls show that 52 percent of American teenagers
believe in astrology. Among biology teachers, 34 percent think psychic
powers can be used to read peoples' thoughts, 29 percent believe we can
communicate with the dead, and 22 percent believe in ghosts. Biology
teachers who use psychic powers to read minds, who communicate with the
dead and who believe in ghosts are as astonishing as Creationists. One
cannot but help but wonder what sort of evolutionary biology they teach
to their young charges.
Creationism comes in more than one
flavor, but the plain, biblical essence maintains that the universe,
including all life and humanity, was created by God in six days sometime
around 6,000 years ago. The theory of evolution maintains that the
universe and everything within it, including humanity, is a bit older,
mysterious and complex than that.
To say the least.
That a majority of Americans hold
creationist beliefs about the universe, the earth and human life (and
death) has both obvious and subtle religious, educational, cultural,
social, political, military and personal consequences. It also has
incalculable and mostly unacknowledged environmental costs. As Van
Potter said in reference to world survival, "To future generations,
ignorance, superstition and illiteracy are the greatest barriers to a
hopeful future for our descendants."
If a majority of the people do not
believe in and are, therefore, ignorant of evolution, then it follows
they do not believe in and are ignorant of the tenets of biology. It is
a biological environment in which we live. All of us live in this
environment. Creationists, evolutionists, environmentalists, religious
fundamentalists, Republicans, Democrats, scientists and evangelists all
live (and die) in the same environment. A person who is convinced that
the environment was created in a few days less than 10,000 years ago for
the convenience and use of human beings is going to view things like
ecology, biology and the connections between different living species
differently than one for whom evolution is an on-going biological
process (experiment?) in which we are all, inescapably, involved.
To say the least.
That somewhere between more than
half to more than two-thirds of Americans do not believe in evolution
helps explain why environmental issues are so far down the list of
American voters’ concerns. To those of us who view the environment of
earth as the very foundation of all life, including human life, such
cavalier apathy is insane, in the same realm of human consciousness as
burning witches at the stake, but, excepting the burned witches
themselves, having far more serious consequences.
Be that as it is, according to the
polls, the environmental movement needs to shift its focus. Using
science to convince voters that the environment and the evolution of all
life are in danger of being irreparably damaged by man’s technology,
stupidity and greed is not sufficient. The environmental movement
operates on the assumption that evolution is accepted by most Americans.
At the risk of being branded witches, environmentalists need to meet the
nonsense that is creationism head on and expose it as the irrational,
brain-dead, fear-based, dogmatic religious superstition that it is.
The environment and human thought
will benefit and show heritable changes over many generations by such a
focus.
To say the least.