For ‘war president,’
biggest battles
not in Iraq
Commentary by Pat Murphy
Gone is "compassionate
conservative." President Bush now prefers the more macho moniker of "war
president."
Probably inevitable. His image for
compassion has plunged—from 64 percent in a 2003 poll to 49 percent in a
new Washington Post poll.
His staged show of military muscle
is everywhere: The Top Gun aircraft carrier landing. Speaking regularly
at military bases with a backdrop of uniformed service personnel and
wearing a military windbreaker with unit insignia. Speeches devoted to
war, including the memorable bravado challenge to Iraqi guerillas,
"bring ’em on."
Anyone remember presidential
photos at a soup kitchen for the homeless, a nursing home, or with any
constituencies needing compassion?
Compassion, instead, goes to
polluting industries that stuff Bush campaign coffers in exchange for
relaxed or non-existent enforcement. Ditto for compassionate tax breaks
for upper income brackets.
As "war president," Bush shows
none of the manly, the-buck-stops-here qualities historians associate
with Washington, Lincoln, Wilson, Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt,
Truman, and Eisenhower.
Bush threw up obstacle after
obstacle to duck testifying to the 9/11 Commission and thus providing
Americans a report directly from their "war president."
Now, after bowing to bipartisan
demands and agreeing to testify, the president demanded the right of
Vice President Cheney to be alongside him, presumably to prevent the
president from contradictory statements about what he knew and when he
knew it, and to answer complex questions.
(Former President Clinton and Vice
President Gore will appear separately.)
Unlike other "war presidents,"
President Bush bucks public accountability to Cheney, Defense Secretary
Rumsfeld, State Secretary Powell and generals in the field, along with
the embattled National Security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, whom Bush
tried unsuccessfully to shield from going under oath in public before
the 9/11 commission.
Bush instead flits around the
country on Air Force One reciting an unchanging speech about millions of
new jobs just over the horizon and a rosy outcome to the blood spilling
in Iraq (while more GI bodies return home in flag draped caskets that
Bush won’t allow to be photographed being unloaded from military
aircraft.)
As to whether he used fraudulent
information about Saddam Hussein’s doomsday weapons to mislead the
nation and Congress, the president is dismissive, saying the world is
better without Saddam. He ignores the central issue of whether he lied.
It’s not working.
Conservative Republican Sen. Pat
Roberts, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, lashed out at
"embarrassing" flawed intelligence of Bush & Co.
The 9/11 Commission’s chair and
vice chair, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, said on Sunday 9/11 was
preventable.
And out this week is a new book
about the Bush White House, "Worse Than Watergate," whose author, John
Dean, knows about presidential lying: Dean was the ousted President
Nixon’s special counsel and blew the whistle on Nixon’s Watergate
cover-up.