Kerry’s biggest foe
is his mouth
Commentary by Pat Murphy
Perhaps dazzled into complacency
by his smooth glide to the Democratic presidential nomination, Sen. John
Kerry is getting reckless on the campaign trail.
Kerry forgets the failings of Al
Gore, Howard Dean and George W. Bush—their mouths.
Twice in one week he’s made verbal
gaffes that put him on the defensive while handing President Bush’s
strategists a tidy set of campaign zingers to use over and over and for
political reporters to repeat time and again.
First, an open microphone caught
him telling supporters he faces "the most crooked, you know, lying group
I've ever seen."
Kerry dodged, denying he was
talking about President Bush, his putative November opponent. Instead he
claimed he meant Bush campaign workers. However, he failed to cite what
lies and crookedness he had in mind.
Then, a few days later in speaking
to Florida supporters, Kerry boasted:
"I’ve met foreign leaders who
can’t go out and say it publicly, but boy, they look at you and say,
‘You gotta win this, you gotta beat this guy, we need a new policy,’
things like that."
Again, dodging and weaving when
asked for names of "foreign leaders" he’d met, Kerry claimed a different
quote, saying he had "heard" from foreign leaders rather than having
"met" them.
Still, he wouldn’t or couldn’t
name anyone, and faced an embarrassing moment when challenged at a
Pennsylvania town hall meeting to name the foreign leaders, finally
blurting to questioner Cedric Brown:
"That’s none of your business."
Oh? None of a voter’s business
about a presidential candidate’s public boasts of support from foreign
leaders?
If Sen. Kerry isn’t prepared to
back up high-handed claims, then he shouldn’t recklessly make them.
This sort of loose-lip blundering
is what turned Vice President Al Gore into a late night comic caricature
with claims of having invented the Internet.
Mouthiness—his now legendary
scream—led to Howard Dean’s downfall.
And Kerry surely needs no
reminding that President Bush’s support is tenuous because of deceitful
claims—the "imminent threat" of Iraq’s nonexistent weapons of mass
destruction, empty promises of millions of new jobs, hollow pledges of
fiscal prudence, understating the new Medicare plan by $200 billion.
Kerry doesn’t have spare political
capital to waste so carelessly and casually. Voters are nearly equally
divided on their choices.
Standing in the wings to rob
either candidate of a percentage or two of support is the egomaniacal
political Luddite, Ralph Nader.
If more GIs die in Iraq, if jobs
at home don't materialize by hundreds of thousands, if even Republican
congressmen run from Bush’s plunder-the-Treasury budgets, Kerry need not
resort to marginally believable rhetoric.
But if exuberant braggadocio
intoxicates Kerry, and he pops off with hyperbole that raises eyebrows
about his veracity, he might as well reserve a plot in the political
graveyard of also-rans who forgot that voters sometimes are smarter than
candidates and can spot shiftiness in an instant.