County ordered
to pay $10,000
Planning decision overturned
"This fear, or ‘smell,’ is the
apparent reason for the denial of the application, rather than whether
the application complied with the applicable zoning ordinances and
statutes."
— JAMES MAY, 5th District
judge
By GREG STAHL
Express Staff Writer
In a nine-page decision issued
last week, a district judge scolded the Blaine County Commission for
basing a planning decision on the threat of a zoning infraction.
The case involved the final
approval request for a building permit issued to John and Mary Davidson
at their mid-valley Heatherlands duplex.
"The board acted in violation of
statutory provisions, acted in excess of the statutory authority; the
decision was not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a
whole, and (the board) acted arbitrarily and capriciously," wrote 5th
District Judge James May.
"Zoning decisions cannot be based
on fear of what might happen in the future," May summarized.
May also ordered that Blaine
County pay approximately $10,000 in court costs and attorney’s fees.
"I think the decision is important
for a couple of reasons," said attorney Gary Slette, who argued the case
on behalf of Blaine County property owners John and Mary Ann Davidson.
"First, when an applicant brings in an application that meets the
requirements of the county’s own zoning law, they have an entitlement to
have it approved.
"Secondly, an award of costs and
attorneys fees against the county should be of some interest if the
judge finds that the county acted arbitrarily and capriciously. I think
the county has to be held accountable for its actions."
The case in question involved
seemingly ordinary planning and zoning business. The Davidsons obtained
a building permit for a duplex with a storage area above the garage,
with outside access to each separate storage area.
The Davidsons then attempted to
exceed the provisions of their permit by converting the storage area to
a separate living unit. Upon discovering this, Blaine County issued a
stop work order on the project.
The townhomes were eventually
completed without the extra unit, but county commissioners said they
feared the Davidsons still intended to build the unit and denied their
final approval request.
"This fear, or ‘smell,’ is the
apparent reason for the denial of the application, rather than whether
the application complied with the applicable zoning ordinances and
statutes," May wrote.
According to the Blaine County
Commission’s August 11, 2003, minutes, Commission Chairman Dennis Wright
pushed for the denial. Commissioner Sarah Michael was absent, and
Commissioner Mary Ann Mix asked to discuss the matter in executive
session, though eventually voted for the denial.
"You know, Gary (Slette), I really
just can’t get past that smell test. I really can’t," Wright said in the
August meeting. "You know, I’ve got to call it the way I see it. I see
what I believe what Mr. Davidson intended to build before he got
caught."