TDR advocates
rally troops
Goal is to test program in
Hailey
By MATT FURBER
Express Staff Writer
Pushing for a system to protect
more open space in Blaine County, community members with diverse
backgrounds met this week to discuss the feasibility of implementing a
Transfer of Development Rights program in Hailey.
A TDR is a voluntary and
systematic tool for helping developers realize the financial value of
their property, said Scott Boettger, executive director of the Wood
River Land Trust. Boettger helped lead the meeting at the Community
Campus in Hailey Wednesday, March 10. He note that TDRs have been
employed around the country, particularly in popular mountain
communities like Aspen and Lake Tahoe. They are intended to help the
communities realize the intrinsic value of open space for public access,
land conservation and protecting wildlife habitat.
TDR advocates, developers,
interested citizens and government employees attended the meeting. Becki
Keefer, chairwoman of the Hailey Parks and Lands Board, Christopher
Simms, executive director of Citizens for Smart Growth and Martin
Flannes, a development attorney who’s also a founding member of a green
building and development consulting group called Developing Green also
facilitated the discussion.
The advocates are interested in
seeing a regional TDR program, but plan to test the waters by presenting
a plan to the city of Hailey for consideration in the near future.
Blaine County has a draft of a TDR ordinance on the books that Simms
said is a good base for a draft ordinance the city of Hailey could
consider.
"We want to take it to the Hailey
City Council and see where they stand," said Flannes, who has worked
with TDR programs in the Lake Tahoe area.
Hailey Mayor Susan McBryant has
said a TDR program that comes from grassroots organizers would be
reviewed by the city.
One idea is to create a TDR bank
where development rights can be bought and sold. Property owners would
get units of development credit for "sending zones" where sensitive
property remains undeveloped. Developers would buy rights and use them
in "receiving zones," which in theory are areas of the city where the
community would prefer to see density.
Keefer said that according to
information gathered from the Hailey Planning and Zoning Commission,
Hailey’s maximum population could double to 14,500 at build out. Whether
enough developable land exists in the city to accommodate the growth was
a matter of debate during the meeting.
Long-time Wood River Valley
developer Rod Kegley said it is possible that the capacity for people
could be determined by the availability of groundwater. He and others
said a TDR program should not result in a greater population than what
may happen under current city and county ordinances.
"We have already run out of
highway space," he said. "Population numbers (predicted) under current
county ordinances gags me. I don’t believe we have enough water today
for build out."
Keefer said it would take another
2,500 living units to accommodate the population predicted for Hailey.
Some of that development could come from successful annexations, but
even if Cutters Ranch, Justus Ranch, Quigley Canyon and Croy Canyon land
is annexed the city would still need about 1500 units to accommodate the
population increase, Keefer said.
Hailey Planning Director Kathy
Grotto, who attended to meeting out of her own interest, said the number
of developable units within the current city limits are likely to
increase as some properties change from single family homes to
multi-family developments.
Cutters Ranch developer John
Campbell said people who live near receiving zones will "complain
loudly" to density in their backyards.
"I think (TDRs) make a lot of
sense in concept . . . (but) people don’t like density. They don’t care
(if new development) is closer to the (city core) than half of the city.
They don’t like it near them," he said. "I am a living example of that."
"It’s a very valid point," Flannes
said. "We thought about (where density should go) a lot. (The city)
could have all the fights now or one at a time. But, density has to go
somewhere, Flannes said. He said some TDRs could be purchased and never
developed, a trend in Aspen that has reduced density.
The goal of TDRs is to prevent
haphazard development Boettger said. He said the benefits of open space
need to outweigh the impacts of density.
"We’re at a point where the hard
decisions need to be made," Boettger said. "Do we want to make a
presentation to the city?"
Most people attending the meeting
agreed that the time is right to approach the city with a plan. Citizens
for Smart Growth will host a forum March 30 in the Community Campus
auditorium to discuss the fiscal impacts of small versus large
development projects.