Nader should stay home
Until a few years ago Ralph Nader
was a selfless crusader on a quest to protect the lives of Americans.
His stubborn advocacy of moral principle in consumer affairs raised the
moral, environmental, health, safety and communication standards of
America.
His 1965 book, "Unsafe at Any
Speed," and the automobile safety standards he forced on an
uncooperative industry saved more lives and mangled bodies than, say,
have been lost in Iraq.
America has benefited immeasurably
from Nader’s work. Among the government agencies and laws created
through Nader’s efforts are Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, the Safe Drinking Water
Act and the Freedom of Information Act.
Nader was unequaled as a consumer
activist who changed the system. His contention that the two-party
system of American government is controlled by corporate and big
business interests at the expense of the public’s well being is
accurate. But his decision to switch from activist to presidential
candidate in 2000 was a mistake that undid a life’s work by handing the
presidency to the environmental, economic, civil rights, justice and
international affairs catastrophe that is the Bush administration.
Nader would make a terrible
president, but he might have changed the financing laws of American
politics had he stayed with his activist strengths. But he didn’t, and
his candidacy in 2000 was forgivable if disastrous human folly.
His 2004 presidential candidacy is
incomprehensible, self-centered stupidity. It may undo the reputation of
a man who should go down in history as a great American, but who may
turn out to be just another fool for power.