Airport reimbursed
for Tutor suit costs
Insurance will cover up to $1
million
By PAT MURPHY
Express Staff Writer
Still reveling in the federal
court decision upholding its ban on larger jets, the Friedman Memorial
Airport Authority received more good news this week.
One of the airports insurers,
Royal & Sunalliance, sent Friedman Memorial reimbursement checks
totaling $416,474 to cover preliminary legal costs of fighting the
lawsuit filed by California multimillionaire-jet owner Ronald Tutor.
Using a Freedom of Information
public documents request, the Mountain Express obtained copies of the
three checks—for $20,000, $281,543.56 and $114,930.92.
Through December, airport legal
costs totaled $600,000, according to Airport Manager Rick Baird, with
January bills yet to be submitted.
For this lawsuit, Friedman
Memorial has hired an aviation litigation specialty attorney, Peter
Kirsch, of Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell, of Denver.
Up to $1 million of legal costs
will be covered by the airport’s policy, according to airport attorney
Barry Luboviski of Ketchum.
Costs are bound to increase. One
of Tutor’s senior attorneys, Jonathan Morse, of Santa Monica, Calif.,
has announced plans to appeal Federal District Judge Lynn Winmill’s
decision throwing Tutor’s suit out of court.
Luboviski told authority members
that he believes the airport has "a reasonable chance" of the courts
ordering Tutor to repay the airport’s legal fees. Any repayment,
however, traditionally is turned over to the insurance company to
reimburse its payments.
During the authority’s monthly
meeting Tuesday, Feb. 10, Luboviski characterized Judge Winmill’s
30-page order on Jan. 20 dismissing Tutor’s claims as "scathing" and the
lawsuit itself as "frivolous."
He told the board that he’s
received congratulatory calls from throughout the country, many
expressing resentment that a wealthy California tycoon would attempt to
dictate airport operating policies.
Baird said he also received calls
from throughout the nation, especially from airport managers concerned
about the precedence the Tutor claims would have created for their
operations had he won.
Owners and operators of larger
jets such as the BBJ have been hoping to get access to smaller airports
because of their convenience for executives.
Baird observed that if the
thousands of pages of documents gathered by the airport staff as
evidence for the court fight were fashioned into a boat anchor, "the
paperwork could anchor a significant vessel."
In rejecting Tutor’s core claims
that his constitutional rights to travel were being denied by Friedman
Memorial’s ban on the 737-sized Boeing Business Jet, Judge Winmill wrote
icily: "At most, Mr. Tutor has been inconvenienced by the necessity of
using a method of travel other than that which he prefers."
Tutor, who has a vacation home
north of Ketchum, uses a smaller Gulfstream III jet to commute here from
California. His luxurious, customized BBJ, whose lavish interior
furnishings have been featured in a cable TV documentary, has takeoff
and landing weights far exceeding Friedman’s 95,000-pound limit. In
addition, its wingspan is considered excessive for Friedman’s single
runway and closely aligned nearby taxiways.
Tutor and his company, Tutor-Saliba
Corp., of Sylmar, Calif., which has won huge California public works
contracts, are no strangers to controversy or courtrooms. In articles
tracking Tutor’s rise to prominence, the Los Angeles Times characterizes
Tutor as one of California’s most influential businessmen among
politicians, offering his jet to high-ranking politicians as well as
spending thousands of dollars on election campaigns.
Tutor-Saliba Corp. is now
appealing a judge’s order in 2001 for Tutor-Saliba to pay $30 million to
the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Los Angeles as triple damages for
alleged violations of a construction contract involving Metro Rail.
Despite criticism of his business
practices, Tutor continues to receive huge public works jobs. In the
past year, the company has been awarded a $33 million contract at Van
Nuys Airport, an $18 million sewer system job and a contract to build a
$36.5 million high school, among others.
Many of the criticisms of Tutor-Saliba
involve so-called change orders—modifying contracts after work has
begun.
The late Los Angeles Mayor Tom
Bradley was quoted by the Los Angeles Times as calling Tutor "a
change-order artist" who’s made millions of dollars on project
modifications.