Will Simpson lead
on wilderness?
Idaho Congressman Mike Simpson
still has a chance to be the leader that Central Idaho needs—or fade
into the footnotes of history.
Last year, Simpson and his staff
broadcast his effort to craft a bill to create a federally protected
wilderness in the Boulder and White Cloud mountains of Central Idaho.
Simpson is now in his third term.
He and his staff spent a great deal of time the last couple of years
organizing meetings and conferring with different groups of wilderness
users.
In the fall, the promised plan
became hostage to a fight between southern Idaho farmers and salmon
advocates in a complicated battle over Snake River reservoir water that
advocates want released to carry smolts to the ocean. Drought-ridden
farmers took exception to the demand.
Conservationists sued the federal
government and demanded a new analysis of the effects of Snake River
dams on salmon recovery. The case awaits a judge’s ruling.
It’s time for Simpson to get the
Boulder-White Clouds hostage released. Although some of the players
involved on both sides of the salmon fight are the same ones in
wilderness negotiations, the wilderness designation should be a separate
issue altogether.
Yet, since the bout over salmon,
Simpson’s silence on wilderness has been deafening.
If Simpson has drawn up a plan for
a Boulder-White Clouds wilderness, he’s been keeping it under lock and
key. No one in the public—including people who were part of the
discussions--have seen anything that looks remotely like a bill for a
new wilderness area.
Simpson has a choice.
He can use the charisma and talent
that served him well in the Idaho House for 14 years and brought
bickering legislators together under his gavel when he was Speaker of
the House for six years. Or, he can decide the whole issue is too hot to
handle and drop it.
That would be a shame.
The Boulder and White Clouds
mountains have long been designated as wilderness study areas. The
economic arguments against wilderness have faded away in light of
evidence that wilderness produces economic benefits for nearby
communities.
Anyone who hikes or camps in these
mountains knows they need and deserve wilderness protection. The
alternative is to watch this wilderness waste away as the incursions of
man take their toll.
Long ago, this nation acknowledged
that people need places in which to escape from the noise and the
demands of modern society.
As the nation’s population has
continued to grow, the need has become acute. The economics are there.
The discussions are over.
What this wilderness needs now is
leadership. Only Simpson can decide if he will provide it.