Cutters Ranch
annexation
application tabled
Developers present updated plan
By MATT FURBER
Express Staff Writer
The Hailey City Council tabled the
Cutters Ranch annexation application by John Campbell and Steve Brown
after the third city council meeting on the matter, Monday, Feb. 9.
The developers propose to develop
the 142-acre Blaine County property on the north edge of Hailey city
limits as a residential subdivision, but they would prefer to conform to
the zoning specifications of the city of Hailey, thereby taking
advantage of city municipal services.
The City Council has been careful
to review all aspects of the application seeking to determine if
benefits to the city outweigh the impacts expanding city borders would
have on city services and infrastructure. New information and a new
concept for the property, based on public and council feedback, has
resulted in a new plan being forwarded by the developers.
The latest concept calls for a
reduction in the number of lots from 135 to closer to 100. The partners
also propose to limit building to the west side of the irrigation canal
that runs through the property, in accordance with BLM and Fish and Game
recommendations for protecting wildlife grazing areas. The new plan
would also provide a greater variety of lots, including smaller less
expensive properties.
Campbell and Brown borrowed
language from Citizens for Smart Growth to articulate their own goals.
They stressed the proximity of the property to the town center,
considered hypothetically by Campbell to be Atkinsons’ Market, which
would make most of the property proposed for annexation within a one
mile walk.
"If residential developments, of
town site density, are not going to be build on a parcel so close to the
commercial core, then where will the people live?" Campbell said,
reading from a letter written by Citizens for Smart Growth Executive
Director Christopher Simms. "The areas outside of town, particularly the
south, will continue to be developed at one to five acres per lot,
thereby eating up open space, wildlife habitat and productive
agricultural land. These new developments outside the city will have the
same adverse impacts on the city as a more densely developed site within
the city, with none of the benefits and all the additional consequences.
Sprawling development will cause further (Main Street) traffic
congestion, polluted air, long commute times, social isolation and
unhealthy automobile dependence."
Campbell said he wanted to clarify
details about the traffic study that had been submitted at the previous
meeting, explaining that he did expect an increase in traffic, but
according to the traffic study the partners had commissioned, only a
slight increase would occur.
Campbell and Brown addressed other
concerns like protecting city well heads and argued that having the lots
connected to city sewer should be considered, because he said the safety
of septic systems in the valley has not been thoroughly studied
according to spokespersons for South Central District Health. Campbell
asked if pollution from septic systems was a risk worth taking.
Brown submitted a property tax
model for consideration. He said the project would provide tax revenues
that would sufficiently cover the costs of the development’s impact on
city infrastructure. He also said that according to the multiple listing
service available to realtors currently in Hailey, there are 13
properties listed for sale at $300,000 or less.
Describing how home prices have
jumped in the last few years in Hailey, Campbell said he wanted to
stress the need for more inventory in the city.
"Unless you have inventory, the
skyrocketing (prices) is going to continue," he said.
Acting on the recommendation of
landscape architect Ben Young, the new plan shows more density in the
southwest corner of the property near the entrance to Myrtle Street.
Attempting to provide more diversity of lot sizes, the new plan shows
less density on the northern portion of the property adjacent to
Hiawatha Street that would more resemble current county lots in the
neighborhood.
Because the number of lots
proposed for the project have changed, the application will be noticed
for an unspecified date at which time council deliberation and public
comment will be heard on the new proposal.