Bully lawsuit
Semi-trailer trucks don’t file lawsuits
over the fact they’re too big to travel some of the cow paths Idaho calls roads.
SUVs don’t file suits over the fact they
can’t drive down the valley’s bike path or trails traveled by only horses or
mountain bikes.
Why? Because common sense tells them it’s
a silly thing to do.
Yet, California businessman Ron Tutor has
decided to continue his legal battle to land his Boeing business jet in Hailey,
despite the fact that it exceeds the 95,000 pound weight limit on the little
airport’s runway.
Last month, Idaho Federal District Court
Judge Lynn B. Winmill ruled against every single count of Tutor’s lawsuit
against Friedman Memorial Airport. Tutor’s attorneys are preparing an appeal.
The court ruled that Tutor was not denied
due process or equal protection under the U.S. and Idaho Constitutions.
The court ruled that Friedman airport did
not violate the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution because prohibiting
heavy jets from landing on a runway that isn’t designed to support them does not
interfere with interstate commerce.
The court ruled that Tutor was not denied
the right to travel, which is guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution. In fact, the court noted Tutor had traveled to Hailey many
times—on smaller planes.
The court referred to an earlier Ninth
Circuit opinion when it held, "Indeed, even a complete lack of choice in means
of travel ‘may be unfortunate, but is not unconstitutional.’’’
The court also said that Tutor had no
right to take private legal action under federal laws that apply to noise,
capacity and improvements at airports that accept federal money. That, said the
court, is the right of the Secretary of Transportation, who oversees such
airports.
The court denied Tutor any injunctions
granting access to the airport.
Though he lost on all counts, Tutor won’t
give it up.
As a multimillionaire, perhaps Tutor won’t
miss the money the suit is costing him for expensive attorneys. Still, it seems
like it would be a lot more fun to charter slimmer luxury jets for his trips to
the valley than to pay legal fees.
As for the little airport, the continuing
lawsuit is draining money from its coffers that would be better spent on safety
and terminal improvements. The airport has spent $600,000 on the suit to date,
and the January bills aren’t in yet.
Tutor has a right under the law to appeal
the court’s decision, but the move is looking more like a bully action against a
small town airport that can ill afford to defend itself than an appeal to remedy
injustice.
The attraction of Sun Valley as a vacation
destination is understandable. But the lengths to which Tutor is going in
demanding the privilege to arrive in any plane he chooses defies all logic.