Judge throws out Tutor’s big jet suit
By MATT FURBER and GREG STAHL
Express Staff Writer
A federal judge affirmed Tuesday, Jan. 20,
that the Friedman Memorial Airport in Hailey could restrict the weight of
airplanes landing at the 230-acre airport.
Federal District Court Judge B. Lynn
Winmill handed California construction magnate Ronald Tutor a defeat Tuesday
when he threw out Tutor’s lawsuit seeking to dispose of airplane weight
restrictions used at the Hailey airport.
Winmill’s decision headed off a trail that
had been scheduled to begin Monday, Jan. 26.
"I’m ecstatic, totally ecstatic," said
Friedman Airport Authority Chair Mary Ann Mix. "This is really a monumental
decision for us, and it takes a huge, huge load off our minds. It’s been
difficult to conduct business as usual with this hanging over us."
At issue was a dispute over enforcement of
weight restrictions imposed by the airport on aircraft like Tutor’s
171,000-pound Boeing 737 business jet and whether the airport had the authority
to restrict Tutor from landing at the publicly funded airport.
Arguing for the airport, Washington,
D.C.-based attorney Eric Pilsk said the airport’s 95,000-pound weight
restriction predates FAA rules governed by the Airport Noise and Capacity Act (ANCA).
The act, which became law on Oct. 1, 1990, includes conditions for which
compliance is required before an access restriction can be imposed on an
airport.
Arguing for Tutor, Jonathan Morse, of
Santa Monica, Calif., said that, if there is a maximum weight restriction at the
airport, there is nothing in writing to look at. He said the decision by the
airport to restrict Tutor was arbitrary and capricious.
However, Winmill said Tutor’s arguments
"are nothing more than generalities, which do little to explain how the airport
has violated state law…(Tutor and his company) have not shown any genuine issue
of material fact that the airport has violated any laws of the state of Idaho."
Rick Baird, airport manager, said the
importance of Winmill’s decision can not be overlooked.
"It means we’re not going to change the
way we’ve been doing business," he said. "It means that any aircraft is welcome
to land here as long as it doesn’t weigh over 95,000 pounds.
"We are, of course, very elated and very
happy that the judge ruled the way he did. It’s been a long year getting to this
point."
On Thursday, Jan. 15, attorneys in the
case argued in federal court in Boise.
During the hearing, Winmill generally
seemed to agree with the defendants. He said he was concerned with why the FAA
wasn’t enforcing the rules if there had been a violation.
Winmill said he was aware of the coming
trial date and would try to provide a written decision in due course. He also
said he had serious reservations about whether Tutor could have a "private right
of action" under an unequal protection claim.
"Certainly the weight restriction is not
an unreasonable claim," he said.
Winmill also asked Morse if Tutor, who was
coming to Sun Valley when the airport chose to restrict 737 charter flights
operated by Sport Tours in 1991, had been restricted from public hearings on the
matter. At the time the Airport Authority gave guidance to the new airport
manager, Rick Baird, not to impose impact fees but to follow the weight
restriction ban.
Morse said he was not aware whether or not
Tutor had been restricted from the hearings. He also said after the hearing on
Thursday that the FAA did not have time to pursue every violation of enforcement
rules, which is why Tutor was pursuing the issue in court.