‘Teaching’ marital bliss?
Commentary by Pat Murphy
Since human history first was recorded in
petroglyphs by cave men, every conceivable device has been used to improve human
behavior to be more civil, more accommodating, moral.
When threats failed, spiritual damnation
of the soul was tried. That failing, bribery and promises of a better life were
dangled before the uncivil and dissolute. Mood altering medications and
counseling therapy eventually found their way into the mix. Lawsuits and
mandatory jail time seem to be current attempts.
Now, President Bush wants to try his hand
at shaping behavior at the most intimate personal level with his $1.5 billion
"healthy marriage" project. His idea is to teach couples—especially inner city
couples (read that, minority and low income couples)—how to develop strong
marriages.
If Washington can invest billions in
weapons systems that fizzle—which seems to be White House reasoning—why not pour
a modest billion or so bucks into the swampy uncertainties of matrimony, even if
it flops.
Having just celebrated our 50th wedding
anniversary, my wife and I can testify that successful marriages are
complicated, often stressful experiences in up-close personal durability and
patience.
Husbands and wives reaching their 50th
year together know success is built on perseverance, loyalty, respect, enduring
tough times, sacrifice, pain, failure and success, give and take, conciliation.
Call it character—something that
individuals, rich and poor, learn from parents and their upbringing, not by
rote. If bride and groom don't have character by the time they recite "I do" at
the altar (or before a civil magistrate), Healthy Marriage 101 isn’t apt to
prevent matrimonial self-destruction.
Divorce is endemic to the American way.
Marital discord is an industry for therapists, counselors, lawyers, courts,
collection agents tracking down deadbeat dads, foster homes, government child
protective agencies and more.
Causes run the gamut of human
weaknesses—money, drugs, alcoholism, infidelity, joblessness, stress, abuse,
hopelessness, boredom, parenting overload and more. Sooner or later something is
bound to test a couple’s will and determination to remain together, and not even
the most optimist coaching can overcome a couple’s despairing sense of futility.
Big things shouldn’t be expected of Bush’s
plan. Like the election year cascade of other proposals, "healthy marriage"
really is political sop to religious conservatives who seem convinced that
Washington can create stable marriages even if it can’t create honesty in
executive suites of corporate America.
By inviting federal intervention to rescue
romance from domestic failure, religious activists surely concede the failure of
churches.
By the time the $1.5 billion "healthy
marriage" budget is exhausted, if ever approved, President Bush’s program won’t
change the dismal divorce rate. However, it will spawn a new bureaucracy of
sociologists studying the roots of unhappy marriages; work for marriage
counselors; paperwork for statisticians keeping track of how funds are spent, on
whom and for what; rents for landlords offering space to bureaucrats, and
bragging rights to Republican sloganeers trying to promote George W. Bush as the
"compassionate conservative."