Governor’s budget close, lawmakers say
"I think it’s a pretty bare bones
budget, and the state’s still hurting. For people to argue otherwise is not
fair. We had this infusion of money from the federal government, and we’re not
going to have it next year."
— WENDY JAQUET, House Minority
Leader
By GREG STAHL
Express Staff Writer
District 25 lawmakers say Idaho Gov.
Dirk Kempthorne’s financial blueprint for the state accurately reflects Idaho’s
status as a state still clawing its way out of financial straits.
In a combined state of the state and
budget address issued Monday, Jan. 12, Kempthorne told Idaho’s 105 legislators
that they must focus on the 2005 and 2006 fiscal years. The key word this year
is restraint, he said.
He said his $2 billion budget "is
structured to keep all of us on the path to recovery."
"It’s built on the principle of restraint,
with a commitment to meet out legal obligations and ongoing support for basic
services while aggressively pursuing that which is working," he said.
House Minority Leader Wendy Jaquet,
D-Ketchum, said the governor’s budget appears to hold a line established during
last year’s record-long legislative session.
"I think it’s a pretty bare bones budget,
and the state’s still hurting," Jaquet said. "For people to argue otherwise is
not fair. We had this infusion of money from the federal government, and we’re
not going to have it next year."
Along with $80 million of one-time federal
aid, which will be used up by the end of the 2005 fiscal year, Idaho’s 6 percent
temporary sales tax will expire at the same time and cut an estimated $170
million from the revenue stream.
A fluke of timing will also add an
additional $20 million pay period for state employees in 2006, Kempthorne
pointed out.
The governor said the legislature must
have vision to look beyond the current fiscal year and into the next, a point
that Jaquet and Senate Minority Leader Clint Stennett, D-Ketchum, said they
strongly agree with.
"I thought he was really smart to make it
a two-year budget," Jaquet said. "Because he really sent a message to the
conservatives who have been talking about cutting the (6 percent) temporary
sales tax increase."
Stennett agreed, but said the governor
failed in his speech to assume a leadership role on several crucial issues.
"A two-year budget plan is a good idea,"
he said. "I think where it lacks vision, in my opinion—there are some things
that the governor can do that don’t require money but require some political
capital."
Kempthorne could have taken a leadership
role regarding wilderness negotiations for the Owyhee canyon country and the
Boulder-White Cloud mountains, Stennett said. He could have taken a position on
air quality issues in the Magic and Treasure valleys. He might have weighed in
on an impending fight over Snake River water.
"Those are big issues that aren’t part of
the budget that the governor can work on," Stennett said. "If I was in his
position, I would try to go out and try to resolve some of these leadership
issues."
Both local lawmakers said they were
concerned about the governor’s proposals to cut funding for technology programs
in Idaho’s schools while boosting the schools’ discretionary money by $10
million.
They both also expressed concern that the
governor did not budget cost-of-living raises for state employees, but earmarked
$10 million for merit-based salary increases.
The District 25 lawmakers also said they
were pleased the governor proposed to raise the tax credit offered for new jobs
and to double the tax reduction for people who purchase long-term health care
insurance. They also lauded the governor’s commitment to economic development
and job creation.
But Jaquet pointed out that education
"goes hand in hand" with economic development.
Specifics aside, the governor’s budget is
close, they said.
"If it’s not the governor’s budget, per
se, it’s something awfully similar," Stennett said.