Mad policy, mad cows
The U.S. government should have taken
better, bigger, and bolder steps to protect the nation’s food supply from mad
cow disease in America.
Mad cow disease, a brain-wasting disease
that may be transmitted to humans, first appeared in 1997 in Britain. Then, it
appeared a year ago in Canada. The U.S. government had six precious years to
ensure the food supply—but took only the cheapest and easiest steps.
Scientists determined that spine and brain
matter from sick animals that was included in animal feed was the transmission
agent for the horrible disease.
American reaction was to stop imports of
beef from both countries, to ban feed containing certain animal parts and to
test a paltry number of animals going to slaughter for the disease.
Beyond that, America’s leaders did
nothing, preferring to believe half-measures would protect the nation from a
disease that can take up to 10 years to manifest itself.
The federal government adopted this mad
approach even though technology existed to develop a computerized system to
track every cow from birth to the slaughterhouse. Computer chips implanted in
every animal, or sturdy ear tags with bar codes like the ones on every grocery
store item, could have been used to track age, health, feed exposure and the
whereabouts of every animal destined for grocery shelves.
It didn’t happen.
It didn’t happen because America was mad
at government. It was bewitched by a "free" market that was sending Wall Street
stock prices into the stratosphere.
Budget slashing and tax cutting were the
order of the day because, as politicians told us emphatically, taxes are "your
money." They insisted citizens shouldn’t have to send "our money" to Washington,
where, they insisted, it would be wasted.
At the same time we were assured that
industrial agriculture and other businesses could best take care of themselves
if expensive government regulation were removed or reduced.
If there is a lesson to be learned from
the appearance of mad cow disease within our borders, it’s that it can be
dangerous to take government for granted.
When times are good and commerce proceeds
apace, it’s easy to complain about government inefficiency and bloated
bureaucracies.
What’s hard is to support leaders wise
enough to cut fat bureaucracies while growing other necessary services—food
inspection and testing, for example—at the same time.
The sick cow that was ground into burger
showed us with fearful certainty the consequences of poorly regulated global
food distribution. The batch of burger in question was distributed not only in
the Northwest and California, but as far away as Guam.
Ranchers, dairy farmers, feedlot owners
and global food wholesalers failed to protect America’s food supply. Their work
to extract every last dime from every last cow without government interference
backfired on everyone.
With frightful certainty, they
demonstrated why we need government to organize and do the things people cannot
or will not do on their own.