Grazing to be curtailed in East Fork
drainage
"I’ve been criticized quite a bit
about placing the value of the health of natural resources beyond other values."
— DEB COOPER, Former SNRA Area
Ranger
By GREG STAHL
Express Staff Writer
The Sawtooth National Recreation Area is
scheduled today to release a long-awaited environmental study and related
management decisions on cattle grazing in the East Fork of the Salmon River
valley on the eastern slope of the White Cloud mountains.
The decision appears to reach a compromise
position between proposed curtailment of grazing in the area and the status quo,
which was deemed to be damaging to natural resources and recreation
opportunities.
In March, the U.S. Forest Service released
a draft of the Upper and Lower East Fork Cattle and Horse Allotment Management
Plans that proposed to reduce in half the size and scope of two grazing
allotments used by seven Custer County ranchers.
The final decision, made by Area Ranger
Deb Cooper before her departure for Alaska last week, will temporarily reduce
livestock grazing in selected areas to allow the land and flora to recuperate.
When specified resource conditions are met, livestock use will be allowed to
resume at levels slightly higher than in the last three years.
The temporary closures, totaling 23,500
acres, include some areas specified in the draft plan in March for permanent
closures.
Areas retained for permanent closure total
27,620 acres.
In an interview two weeks ago, Cooper said
senior Forest Service officials and Idaho congressional representatives gave the
East Fork environmental review unprecedented attention. The final decision was
not hers alone, she said.
There was a "heightened level of interest
internal to the Forest Service on this decision, and many people helped work on
the decision," she said. "Certainly the Idaho delegation is concerned about
maintaining ranching within the state of Idaho, and they’re willing to express
that concern to leaders in the agency.
"I’ve been criticized quite a bit about
placing the value of the health of natural resources beyond other values," she
added.
In a June interview in Sun Valley, U.S.
Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, said he viewed the Forest Service’s draft
environmental impact statement on East Fork grazing as a "product with no intent
to sustain grazing in the East Fork, period."
"I’m not going to sit here and
micromanage, but I really view it as an elimination," he said. "When you reduce
grazing by 60 to 70 percent, you make it uneconomical to graze. The numbers
don’t make it worth getting the cattle to the allotment."
Cooper’s decision culminates nearly six
years of work and analysis on the two allotments, formerly totaling 131,000
acres and now reduced to about 115,000 acres.
The Forest Service began the process of
analyzing the two allotments in the mid-1990s. During the intervening years,
there were three separate opportunities for public review. The most recent
public comment and review phase garnered 224 letters.
"We carefully reviewed these letters,"
said SNRA Acting Area Ranger Terry Clark.
But in addition to the letters,
legislative mandates, involvement with affected ranchers and advice from
resource specialists and regulatory agencies were used to help make a decision,
Clark said.
Additionally, a court decision issued on
April 2 by Federal District Judge B. Lynn Winmill forced the SNRA’s hand.
According to the judge’s decision, the SNRA was in violation of the SNRA’s
enabling legislation, as well as the 1995 Recisions Act, in failing to update
the outdated plans, last completed in 1985 for the Lower East Fork Allotment and
in 1976 for the Lower East Fork Allotment.
The release of the environmental study
this week meets a deadline set by Winmill.
It was the land’s inability to sustain
grazing that ultimately spurred the project and its results.
"Our inability to achieve desired
conditions under current management by both the Forest Service and permitees is
not about finding and placing blame, but it is about conditions that are
inherent to the terrain," Cooper said. "The majority of the land involved with
these two allotments is very steep, rocky, covered with timber and exceedingly
difficult to manage."
Cooper said that, of the 131,317 acres in
the two allotments, approximately 20 to 30 percent of the land produces abundant
forage, is close to water and is not too steep to graze livestock.
"Historically, these allotments were
managed for sheep grazing," she said. "Back in the 1960s, these sheep allotments
were converted to cattle allotments. So far, we have been unable to achieve
desired conditions across all acres of each allotment—conditions that meet the
Forest Plan standards and mandates from Congress."
In rural Custer County, agriculture and
related activities proved the major economic base.
"Specific agricultural activities
associated with ranching and farming are considered by many of the local people
as the economic mainstay of the county," according to the draft EIS.
According to Forest Service documents,
agriculture and agriculture-related services comprised approximately 190 of the
1,220 jobs in Challis in 2000. Mining ranked first with 217 jobs in 2000.
According to the Forest Service, a number
of changes have occurred since grazing allotment management plans were finalized
for the east slope of the White Clouds in the 1970s. Most of the changes have
prompted increased scrutiny.
They include new standards in land and
resource management plans, a number of fish and wildlife species listed as
threatened under the Endangered Species Act, increased recreation and associated
conflicts with livestock and the conversion of allotments from sheep to cattle.
"Every allotment has its challenges, but I
don’t think there’s any allotment on the SNRA that’s as difficult to manage as
these two," Cooper said.