Airport Authority
to decide
Friedman’s
future
Public debates keeping airport
in Hailey or moving it
From B3 to C3 standards
FAA designations for airport design
standards are based on the type of aircraft using or expected to be using an
airport. Aircraft are placed into categories under the airport reference code
(ARC), which has two components: the first category is depicted by a letter (A
through E), indicating aircraft approach speed. The second component relates to
an aircraft’s wingspan and is depicted by a numeral (1 through 6). With
improvements made in the last two years, Friedman Memorial Airport is a nearly
compliant B3 airport, but use by C3 aircraft like the Horizon Airlines Dash 8
Q400 and new FAA rules require design upgrades to C3 status. Typically a change
in FAA safety requirements comes when operations of larger aircraft reach 500
arrivals and departures.
By MATT FURBER
Express Staff Writer
Public reaction to the possibility of a
new airport serving the Wood River Valley is mixed, although generally
supportive of a thorough planning process. There are advocates both for and
against a move.
"I support and encourage the commission to
actively investigate all possible alternatives that would facilitate
accommodating regional jet service to the Wood River Valley, including looking
again at alternative sites," wrote Wally Huffman, Sun Valley Co. general
manager. However, he urged caution in the planning process, citing a number of
concerns. "If the commission concludes that relocation is the only option, and
commits the community accordingly, then what will happen to the next 10 to 15
years while studies, findings, construction, etc., is going on?"
Huffman sent written comments and offered
his help to the Blaine County Airport Authority in its search for the ultimate
strategy and conclusion. His was one of many responses to an Airport Authority
presentation on current Friedman Memorial Airport planning Wednesday, Sept. 24,
in the auditorium of the old Wood River High School.
Others spoke publicly at the special town
hall meeting.
"If most people go for (moving the
airport), I am in the minority," said Bellevue triangle resident Jay Coleman.
"But, if few people say something I will put up a stink. The (current) airport
is a tool by which we can have some growth control, like zoning. Due to outside
demands, government backs down on what they can do. I don’t want to see a repeat
of the St. Luke’s (hospital) situation."
Other south valley residents were less
hesitant about jumping into plans for a new airport.
"Go find a place for 737s," said Bellevue
resident and retired United Airlines pilot, Robert Bouttier. "Make it a full
airport and have yourselves an economic boom."
Helping with the search for an ultimate
solution, airport planner Tom Schnetzer was charged with presenting to the
public a summary of the board’s planning developments. At issue is how the
airport can continue to meet government requirements for the layout of the
airport as use increases.
Airports are required to review design
standards every five years. Schnetzer’s presentation described how the airport
is fulfilling requirements for a B3 airport as larger C3 category aircraft have
already begun to use the facility. Schnetzer described a composite plan showing
what is required to bring the airport up to the latest C3 standard.
Current Federal Aviation Administration
policy does not give airports a choice to limit access, although, previously,
Friedman authorities believed there was flexibility in meeting standards. The
new rules require the airport to meet higher standards as soon as use by a
higher category aircraft reaches 500 operations, including arrivals and
departures..
In August, airport authority members
believed that they would not be able to sell the community on changes required
by a C3 designation. The board set aside Wednesday’s public hearing to present
the current dilemma and get public feedback about how the community felt about
focusing planning on a new site.
Public comment will still be accepted
through the end of the business hours today. At the airport authority’s regular
meeting Oct. 7, a final decision to go forward with planning for a new site for
the airport is possible. Proposals for a new airport would include making some
improvements to the current site in the interim, Schnetzer said.
Once all comment is in, the board will
deliberate amongst themselves and make a decision on which way to go, board
chairwoman Mary Ann Mix said. "It’s about future planning."
Bringing the airport into compliance with
FAA B3 standards has been the main objective since 1994. Completing the work has
been possible mostly through federal airport improvement grants.
There is considerable concern about the
future of Friedman even with a new airport. Could it become a private airport
for general aviation if a new federally funded airport is approved?
The question begs further consideration,
which the airport authority says it will make in the planning process.
"I have taken abuse for promoting moving,"
said Bellevue City Councilman Parke Mitchell, representing the city. "Our major
complaint is not with commercial aircraft, but with private planes, jets flying
over. All planes should be landing (at the new airport) and not flying over
Bellevue."
Mitchell’s comments were met with
applause.
Schnetzer explained that his employer, the
Minneapolis-based Mead & Hunt group, has been working on the airport master plan
for the past year and a half and it is now largely implemented.
Airports are dynamic facilities that are
continually changing to accommodate changes in aircraft design and passenger
demand, said Schnetzer. The airport has been changing since it was first built
as a dirt runway.
"As pressure for use reaches physical
limitations of the community, you have to look at another site," he said. "The
goal of the current master plan is to eliminate as many safety deviations as
possible from FAA requirements, while not expanding the impact on the adjacent
community."