Babbitt says
breach dams
Craig says it won’t happen
"Those four dams are the cause (of the
salmon decline), and the question we face tonight is ‘how?’ Those dams have got
to come down."
— BRUCE BABBITT, Clinton-era
Interior secretary
By GREG STAHL
Express Staff Writer
Equating the fight for the breaching of
four lower Snake River dams with American football, Bruce Babbitt, secretary of
Interior during the Clinton administration, said last week the fray is like
Woody Hayes gridiron tactics. "Three yards and a cloud of dust," he said.
Babbit was the featured speaker Tuesday,
Aug. 19, at a Ketchum fund-raising event for Save Our Wild Salmon, a
Seattle-based nonprofit group that is devoting significant time and effort into
removing four lower Snake River dams to clear the path for threatened and
endangered Snake River salmon and steelhead.
"This (George W. Bush) administration is
not looking for resolution," Babbitt said. "They are looking to grind the
opposition and wear them down.
"Those four dams are the cause (of the
salmon decline), and the question we face tonight is ‘how?’ Those dams have got
to come down."
As he spoke, Babbitt stood on the back
porch of a north-Ketchum home overlooking the meandering Big Wood River. A
fisherman worked idly down stream, rhythmically airing a fly into crystal pools
behind rocks and logs. The sun was low, and the sagebrush covered Boulder
Mountain foothills glowed orange in the waning light.
More than 100 people attentively listened.
Babbitt said that, in 1992 when he was new
to the role of Interior secretary, he did not know much about dams and salmon.
But he soon declared a goal of dismantling at least one large dam during his
tenure. He eventually presided over the dismantling of several dams on waters
ranging from the Kennebec River in Maine to San Geronimo Creek in Marin County,
Calif.
Both of those projects cleared the way for
migratory salmon.
"There are more than 75,000 dams in the
nation, most built long ago, many clearly obsolete," Babbitt said in a 1998
Interior Department press release. "Roy’s Dam (on San Geronimo Creek), for
example, was built in the early 1920s. The role of many of these structures
needs to be reassessed, especially those that have an obvious and adverse effect
on our rivers and threatened and endangered species."
However, one of Babbitt’s most vocal
critics during his tenure as Interior secretary was also in town last week. Sen.
Larry Craig, R-Idaho, said a day after Babbitt’s visit that efforts to breach
the lower Snake River dams would not succeed.
"It will take an act of Congress to remove
the dams," said Craig. And, in the current political climate with concerns about
the risk to U.S. energy security, he said it is highly unlikely that any dams
will be dismantled.
As far as the impact on the river system’s
salmon, Craig said dams were not the culprits. According to a National Marine
Fisheries Service study this year fishermen were enjoying a 30-year record
salmon run. He said a bigger problem for the fish than dams could be "the
character and the quality" of the ocean.
But environmentalists counter that the
vast majority of salmon and steelhead returning from the Pacific Ocean are
hatchery fish that benefited from high water flows during spring migration three
and four years ago.
Craig also said to remove dams would be
costly from an energy standpoint.
For every kilowatt taken off-line, it
would cost 200 to 300 percent to replace the loss of hydrological power
generation with an alternative source, he said. Currently a hydroelectric
kilowatt-hour costs consumers about 3.8 cents.
Craig said he didn’t think Babbitt or his
supporters would be in favor of building a nuclear power plant to replace lost
hydropower.
"I’m not willing to wipe out the Northwest
economy for the fish," Craig said.
But last week north of Ketchum, Babbitt
said progress has been made on attitudes about dams removal.
"Ten years ago, there wasn’t a lot of talk
about blowing up dams," he said.
He also pointed to the 1920s destruction
of Sunbeam Dam on the Salmon River near Stanley, where miners allegedly blew the
dam to pieces when salmon runs dwindled, and called it "a wonderful precedent."
"These are tough times; there’s no doubt
about it," he said. "They’re so tough, I actually yearn for Jim Watt, (Interior
secretary in the Reagan administration)."
He said Watt, a proponent of the so-called
"Sagebrush Rebellion," was full of rhetoric on environmental issues with little
associated action. "Today it’s just the opposite," he said.
Nonetheless, salmon advocates have enjoyed
recent wins.
Last May in response to a lawsuit filed by
a coalition of anadromous fish advocates, a federal judge ruled that government
programs designed to protect the threatened and endangered salmon runs in the
entire Columbia River Basin did not meet the requirements of the Endangered
Species Act.
The federal recovery blueprint did not
include dam breaching as a near-term solution, and fish advocates believe the
judge’s decision could pave the way for breaching to again be considered as a
legitimate option.
Steve Mashuda, an attorney with
Earthjustice who worked on the case on behalf of Save Our Wild Salmon, said at
the North-Ketchum event that the ruling was significant. He also said more
lawsuits that will attempt to make power and water users understand the costs
associated with keeping dams will soon be filed.
"We are, of course, pushing them to listen
to the science and to consider dam removal," he said.
Pat Ford, executive director of Save Our
Wild Salmon, said the organization’s goal is to secure dam breaching by 2006.
"We could have chosen a better
administration to do it under, but that is our goal," he said. "Now is the time,
now through 2004 is the time, for our litigation strategy to succeed. If we
can’t show (the illegality of maintaining the dams) now, we won’t be able to
show it."