
A bird’s eye view of the Boulder and
White Cloud mountains reveals a landscape, twisted and crinkled, like a
flattened piece of wastepaper. Hikers, bikers, motorcyclists, campers, off-road
vehicle drivers, miners and nearby residents have all laid stake to this land.
For proposed wilderness designation to become reality, the groups must look for
common ground. Express photo by Willy Cook
Is it time for a
Boulder-White Clouds Wilderness?
Rep. Simpson tries to appease groups
with wilderness, economic stimulus bill
Idaho’s wilderness areas
Idaho is home to six wilderness areas,
encompassing 4 million acres.
· Selway-Bitterroot (1.09 million
acres)
· Sawtooth (217,000) acres
· Gospel Hump (206,000 acres)
· Frank Church-River of No Return (2.4
million acres)
· Craters of the Moon (43,000 acres)
· Hells Canyon (84,000 acres)
"In some areas everybody is going to
have to swallow…(although)... I have never met anyone who doesn’t agree that we
ought to protect the pristine areas of this state."
— REP. MIKE SIMPSON, R-Idaho
"In fairness to Congressman Simpson,
maybe he’s got such a compelling case for what he’s going to do that maybe I’m
going to turn tail. I want a little more ingenuous information before I jump on
this bandwagon. But I don’t want more wilderness, and that is basically where
this is headed."
— LENORE BARRETT, Idaho state
representative
"It’s very mysterious and nebulous. How
can you comment when you don’t know what’s going on."
— STEW CHRUCHWELL, East Fork of
Salmon ranch for Western Watersheds Project
"Because Challis is basically competing
with 200 other communities like it in the West for economic development, we want
to offer an opportunity for people to gain higher education, those kinds of
things that would be very attractive to a business."
"Frankly, there needs to be a broad
consensus for this, because there are any number of ways it can be killed. If we
don’t have a bill that has broad support, we won’t take it to Congress."
— LINDSAY SLATER, Rep. Mike
Simpson’s chief of staff
"For humans, wilderness areas are
places of solace, but from a wildlife perspective, species don’t have the
confrontation of mechanized human uses that impact them."
— KAZ THEA, NREPA Network regional
coordinator
"I’d like to see it left the way it is.
I’ve seen so much stuff change here, and I’d like to see it stay the same."
— John Downing, 14-year-old Stanley
resident who enjoys motorcycles and backcountry outings with his father
First in a series of three
By GREG STAHL
Express Staff Writer
At 11,815 feet above sea level, Castle
Peak in Idaho’s remote and rugged White Cloud Mountains towers over more than
500,000 acres of contiguous road-free wildlands that bridge two vastly different
cultures.
This wild country, connecting the wealthy
resort kingdom of Sun Valley with the rural and agrarian communities of Custer
County, is a battle ground that has hosted land-use skirmishes for more than 30
years.
In the 1970s, the people of Idaho staved
off a massive molybdenum mine planned for the lower flanks of Castle Peak,
drawing the White Clouds into the political limelight for the first time and
helping to effect congressional designation of the 756,000-acre Sawtooth
National Recreation Area.
Now, 30 years later, with the region’s
land-use conundrums still partially unresolved, Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, is
attempting to strike a chord of compromise among the Boulder and White Cloud
Mountains’ diverse and numerous stakeholders.
Simpson’s pledge and the art of compromise
In 1999, near the shores of Redfish Lake,
just 15 miles northwest of Castle Peak, Simpson stood before a burgeoning crowd
of environmentalists and announced that he would try to craft a wilderness bill
for the Boulder and White Cloud mountains. Four years later, Simpson’s chief of
staff, Lindsay Slater said the congressman is nearly ready to release a plan for
public review, perhaps in September.
Simpson’s proposal, an apparent study in
the art of compromise, would designate about 250,000 acres of the White Cloud
and Boulder Mountains as wilderness. The hybrid wilderness bill, to be called
the "Central Idaho Economic Development and Recreation Act," would also trade
roughly 16,000 acres of public land to Custer County that it would sell to
private interests, netting the county up to $10 million.
Half of the proceeds would be used to fund
a new "Central Idaho Education Center," and half would be retained by the county
for economic development with very few strings attached.
"Because Challis is basically competing
with 200 other communities like it in the West for economic development, we want
to offer an opportunity for people to gain higher education, those kinds of
things that would be very attractive to a business," Slater said.
Concepts disclosed so far also include
potential grazing permit buyouts and ranch purchases that would allow ranchers
in environmentally sensitive areas to relocate.
As part of the compromise, and because
motorized and mechanized uses are not allowed in wilderness areas, proposed
wilderness area boundaries would not encompass areas of traditional snowmobile,
motorcycle and off-road vehicle use. In general, the wilderness would include
areas east of the spine of the White Cloud Mountains and some, but not all, of
the Boulder Mountains.
A significant portion of the wilderness
area would include relatively low-elevation land in the eastern portions of the
mountains to the east of the East Fork of the Salmon River and north of the
North Fork of the Big Lost River. It would stretch east to Jerry Peak.
Areas specifically omitted from the
proposal include the Boulder Basin near Boulder Peak; Champion, Washington and
Fourth of July lakes basins; Warm Springs Meadow and parts of Warm Springs
Creek; Rough and Casino creeks; and Railroad Ridge, Slater said. Some of these
areas are equally prized by environmentalists, mountain bikers, off-road vehicle
riders and snowmobilers.
Slater quickly acknowledged that in this
art of compromise, no one group will get everything it wants.
"The Idaho Conservation League wants more
than 500,000 acres. We’re at half of that, and the congressman is looking at
boundaries that are similar to what the Forest Service recommended, with
adjustments to protect traditional motorized and snowmobile use," Slater said.
Some groups—like the ICL, which has been
brokering the deal on behalf of environmentalists, and the Blue Ribbon
Coalition, which has been working on behalf of motorized and bicycling
interests—have acknowledged that compromise is part of the game. Nevertheless,
nervous apprehension appears to be gnawing at key players on various sides of
the issue as they await the release of Simpson’s official blueprint.
"In fairness to Congressman Simpson, maybe
he’s got such a compelling case for what he’s going to do that maybe I’m going
to turn tail," said State Rep. Lenore Barrett, a conservative Republican from
Challis and a wilderness opponent. "I want a little more ingenuous information
before I jump on this bandwagon. But I don’t want more wilderness, and that is
basically where this is headed."
Stew Churchwell, a Boulder and White Cloud
wilderness supporter, has lived in Custer County for 20 years and manages a
Custer County ranch on the East Fork of Salmon River for Western Watersheds
Project, a Hailey-based environmental group. He also is anxious to learn more
details about Simpson’s plan, but, unlike Barrett, he fears not enough of the
mountain ranges will be included in the final document.
"It’s very mysterious and nebulous," he
said. "How can you comment when you don’t know what’s going on."
But support from people like Barrett and
Churchwell is what the congressman needs, Slater said.
"Frankly, there needs to be a broad
consensus for this, because there are any number of ways it can be killed.
"If we don’t have a bill that has broad
support, we won’t take it to Congress."
The past and the present
In 1968, the American Smelting and
Refining Co. announced plans to mine and process molybdenum at the base of
Castle Peak, prompting a backlash from the state’s budding environmental
community and from the people of Idaho, who elected Gov. Cecil Andrus, in part,
because of his pledges to protect the area.
Andrus, who opposed the ASARCO mine,
became Idaho’s first Democratic governor in 25 years by defeating incumbent Don
Samuelson, a mine supporter. Over the next two years, the debate continued on
how to protect the White Cloud and nearby Sawtooth Mountains.
The Sawtooth National Recreation Area was
established in 1972, along with the Sawtooth Wilderness Area, which encompasses
217,000 acres of staggering granite cirques, peaks and timbered moraines. In
establishing the SNRA and Sawtooth Wilderness, Congress also instructed the U.S.
Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to establish a wilderness study
area in the Boulder and White Cloud Mountains. The request resulted in a
251,100-acre safeguard, which is the only congressionally mandated wilderness
study area in Idaho.
To this day, the 582,931-acres of
road-free wild lands including and surrounding the congressionally mandated
wilderness study area are the largest conterminous road-free area in the lower
48 states.
Since the SNRA was established, there have
been at least three attempts by conservationists and politicians to introduce
legislation establishing a Boulder-White Cloud Wilderness Area. None succeeded.
For some, the current effort represents a
window of opportunity that may not return for at least a generation.
"Opportunities like this don’t come around
all that often," said Geoff Pampush, executive director of The Nature
Conservancy-Idaho.
TNC-Idaho is working with Custer County
ranchers and politicians to help effect the economic stimulus portion of the
deal. However, it has not taken a position on wilderness designation.
"If the moment passes, it is passed for a
long time. If it passes, both (Custer) county loses and the wilderness advocates
lose," Pampush said.
At the crux of the wilderness debate are
the numerous stakeholders who must find common ground for legislation to become
reality.
Throughout the last 30 years, recreational
use in the Boulder-White Clouds by outdoors enthusiasts has steadily increased,
and the skyrocketing popularity of off-road vehicles, mountain bikes and
snowmobiles has hit home in the two mountain ranges. But, while use has
increased, wild populations of certain plants and animals have been on the
decline.
Although wilderness debates often center
around human use and access issues, it is well documented that wildlife and wild
plants are key beneficiaries of wilderness designations.
"For humans, wilderness areas are places
of solace. But from a wildlife perspective, species don’t have the confrontation
of mechanized human uses that impact them," said Kaz Thea, of Hailey. A former
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologist, she is an advocate for the Northern
Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act, a federal bill that would designate wilderness
in road-free areas throughout the Northern Rockies.
"The importance is locking up large tracts
of land, and that’s the beauty of wilderness, because you’re reducing intensive
human uses like off-highway vehicle use," Thea said. "Large blocks of
unfragmented habitat with low human intervention are one of the key aspects of
wilderness areas."
In the Boulder and White Cloud mountains,
a number of species share the land with people, including mountain goats,
bighorn sheep, salmon, gray wolves and Canada lynx. Several species are listed
under the Endangered Species Act, and several more—including a rare plant called
White Clouds milkvetch, which is found only in the White Cloud Mountains—are
considered sensitive species.
For Churchwell, it’s a land of inspiring
beauty as well as an important piece of Idaho’s habitat puzzle.
"The first backpacking trip I did in this
country was in the White Clouds, and I really loved it," he said. "The thing
that draws me, personally, to the White Clouds is the incredible beauty. The
color of those vertical headwalls you really don’t find in other mountains like
the Sawtooths or the Bighorn Crags. It’s so beautiful and so photogenic."
But Idaho is growing, and as the demand
for forest use rises, wildlife, fish, forests and motorized and mechanized
access to them are all at risk.
"Our position is that we feel we should be
able to preserve the current recreation access that our constituents have in the
Boulder-White Clouds area," said Clark Collins, executive director of the Blue
Ribbon Coalition, an organization that represents a broad spectrum of
backcountry recreation interests including horseback riders, mountain bikers,
off-highway vehicle users and snowmobilers.
"In the past, all the wilderness proposals
have only included lands proposed for wilderness, and everyone else be damned,"
Collins said. "Simpson has made it clear that our interests will get something
out of this, and that is designation of land for our use."
An ongoing process
The balance between the conflicting
interests involved in the wilderness discussion, as well as the proposed
economic stimulus package for Custer County, could be precarious.
Environmentalists are calling for more protection, while access groups are
asking for assurances that their members will not be cut out of a myriad of
historical use areas.
What’s more, the concept of giving 16,000
acres of public land to Custer County for economic stimulus has created quite a
stir among grassroots environmentalists.
And this debate aside, Idaho still has
more wild land than any state outside Alaska, with 4 million acres of designated
wilderness and another 17 million acres of Forest Service and BLM land still
bereft of roads and available for potential wilderness protection.
For now, the various interest groups are
assuming a wait-and-see posture.
"Our process is going slow and methodical,
keeping people informed when we can, and then going public with the concepts to
find out what’s going to work and what’s not going to work," Slater said. "Then
we’re trying to find out where the wins are for each affected group."
Next week: The economics of Congressman
Simpson’s proposal