Environmental community unsure of
wilderness deal
"Is wilderness designation gaining
anything that wasn’t there before with wilderness study status? What are we
getting for wilderness designation in Owhyee County, except for some lines on a
map?"
— JON MARVEL, Western Watersheds Project
By GREG STAHL
Express Staff Writer
The secretive nature of negotiations for
two potentially high profile Idaho wilderness designations, as well as potential
concessions negotiating groups may be willing to make to achieve designations,
are ruffling members of the Northwest’s environmental community.
In a five-page letter addressed to the
Idaho Conservation League, The Wilderness Society and The Sierra Club, 38 other
wildlands stakeholders are criticizing the three groups for their work on
potential designation of Owyhee-Bruneau and Boulder-White Cloud wilderness
areas.
The June 2 letter, while specifically
targeting the Owyhee Initiative process, restates concerns for the separate and
unrelated Boulder-White Cloud process, headed by Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho.
"We are extremely concerned about both the
short-term and long-term implications of the Owhyee Initiative in terms of
public involvement, possible circumvention of the National Environmental Policy
Act, wilderness policy, grazing administration, potential public land disposals
and exchanges, and other areas," the letter states.
According to The Wilderness Society, the
Owyhee Initiative process began roughly one and a half years ago at the
invitation of the Owyhee County Commissioners. Conservation groups began meeting
with county officials, ranchers, motorized recreation users, military officials,
outfitters, guides and congressional staff to search for a consensus solution to
the contentious natural resources conflicts in the area.
Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, has pledged to
push legislation if the diverse interests can arrive at a consensus solution to
the land management puzzle there.
However, as last week’s letter indicates,
consensus among the stakeholders who have seats at the Owyhee Initiative’s table
and among the public at large may be different issues.
"Most alarming to us is that by the time
this proposal is finalized, we and the public at large will have no real
opportunity to affect it before it is swept into legislation and through
congress," the letter states. "In addition, there has been no articulation by
your organizations of any bottom line(s), which makes it difficult for us to
trust the process."
Craig Gehrke, The Wilderness Society’s
Idaho director, took exception to the allegation that the Owyhee Initiative
process is a secretive one. The meetings are open to the public, he said.
"People just need to care enough to find
out when the meetings are," he said.
Gehrke also said it is too early to pass
judgment on a process that has not yet produced a tangible document.
"When both packages (Owhyee and Boulder
White Cloud) are done, they’ll be released to the public," Gehrke said. "That’s
when people will start to look at what’s agreeable and what’s not agreeable."
In the letter, the 38 signatories—a Who’s
Who of Western environmentalists—question the proposed independent
administration of an Owhyee wilderness and whether it would conform with the
federal Wilderness Act. They express concerns that only the most scenic portions
of the Owyhee-Bruneau canyons will be "cherry picked" for wilderness
designation. They also question the wisdom of potential public land exchanges or
disposals that would accompany the wilderness bill.
Finally, they contend the potential use of
grazing permit buyouts as a means to appease ranchers in the area is
questionable, although Jon Marvel, director of Hailey-based Western Watersheds
Project, said his group supports the use of permit buyouts.
Further, Marvel said in an interview that
he is less concerned about the lack of information emanating from the process
than about the substance of the discussions in Owhyee County.
"Is wilderness designation gaining
anything that wasn’t there before with wilderness study status?" Marvel asked.
"What are we getting for wilderness designation in Owhyee County, except for
some lines on a map?
"We don’t gain enough from wilderness
designation, and we’re giving things up in order to get it."
Will Caldwell, a Ketchum artist and board
president of the Idaho Sporting Congress, agreed that the apparent compromises
in the Owyhee discussion, and the Boulder-White Cloud process, go too far.
"While some Idaho conservation groups have
succeeded in protecting vast acres of public land by demanding court enforcement
of environmental laws, the Idaho Conservation League is narrowly focused on
pursuit of the holy grail of ‘wilderness’ legislation, and to that end is making
compromising deals with politicians and industry that will override
environmental laws, trade over public lands to counties, deliver public land
management to private interests and weaken the very Wilderness Act it worships,"
Caldwell said.
"This is bad precedent setting and a
losing form of conservation," he said
Speaking specifically about the
Boulder-White Cloud wilderness proposal, which under Simpson’s direction has
been largely secretive, Idaho Conservation League Central Idaho Director Linn
Kincannon said that a deal will have to be significant and meaningful to gain
ICL’s support. ICL will "not be seduced by a bad deal," she said.
"It’s about the future. It’s the
guarantee, to come as close as we can make it today, that this is what it will
be in the future," she said. "If you’re a group that believes wilderness is the
best way to go, perhaps you have to strike a compromise."