Sun Valley eyes changes to commercial
district
Council to review zoning
code update July 17
"We really want to put affordable
housing in. We just want to make it work."
— NED WILLIAMSON, CG-Elkhorn
attorney
By GREGORY FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
Sun Valley City Council members last week
suggested they might take action to require commercial space and affordable
housing as part of some development projects.
In a four-hour council meeting Tuesday,
June 24, council members decided to take a serious look at a proposal to require
that so-called "community housing" and designated commercial space be built as
part of large-scale projects in the city’s two commercial centers.
The decision came as the council reviewed
a set of proposed changes to the zoning code of the city’s Commercial Center
zoning district, which includes substantial amounts of land in Sun Valley
Village and Elkhorn Village.
Ultimately, council members determined
they will conduct a public workshop July 17 to discuss the matter in depth with
city staff and other interested parties. The workshop will be held from noon to
2 p.m., at Sun Valley City Hall. (City officials are expected to review a set of
draft guidelines for a new community-housing policy as part of a separate
workshop yet to be scheduled.)
At issue is a proposed ordinance put forth
by the city Planning and Zoning Commission to amend the municipal code as it
applies to approximately 85 acres of CC-zoned lands.
Importantly, the proposed amendments seek
to alter the defined intent of the CC district by adding language that states
the district is meant to "promote a mix of housing types for families of
different social and income levels."
Two key components of the amendments seek
to establish requirements that new multi-family-dwelling developments on large
parcels in the CC district shall designate 10 percent of the units as
deed-restricted community housing and shall provide 300 square feet of
commercial-use floor space per acre.
The draft ordinance also proposes that new
buildings in the zone shall be limited to 44 feet in height, with allowances for
64-foot buildings developed with specified amounts of commercial space,
affordable housing or hotel rooms.
The City Council’s review of the proposed
ordinance was their third since it was put forth by the P&Z for consideration.
The council last December asked the P&Z to
consider how to limit applications that propose only residential uses—rather
than the intended mix of residential and commercial uses. The council made the
request immediately after it approved a moratorium on new applications for
development projects in the CC district.
The original 120-day moratorium expired in
April but was renewed by the council to allow for continued negotiations on the
matter. The second moratorium will expire in August, after which the city
expects to receive an application by development partnership CG-Elkhorn to
develop the site of the former Elkhorn Resort.
Ned Williamson, attorney for CG-Elkhorn,
told council members at the June 24 meeting that the company is planning to
include affordable housing in its development. However, he said the company
would like to see the city reduce its affordable housing requirement from 10
percent to 6 percent.
"We really want to put affordable housing
in. We just want to make it work," he said.
Williamson also requested that the city
consider allowing developers to establish a percentage of any required
affordable housing in an alternate, off-site location. "I do think there is a
justifiable reason to have the housing in other parts of the community," he
said.
Dick Duncan, director of the
Blaine-Ketchum Housing Authority, said he is in favor of the 10 percent
community-housing requirement.
Christopher Simms, representing Citizens
for Smart Growth, said the organization favors the proposed amendments, but
wants the city to require greater amounts of designated commercial space.
Simms said a commitment by the city to
ensure the two village centers include significant amounts of space for retail
and service businesses would establish the areas as lively, viable
neighborhoods, instead of as mere residential centers.