Schools in a pickle
The No Child Left Behind law
signed in 2002 is threatening to leave lots of kids without teachers.
The law also makes it obvious
that federal lawmakers need to get out of the Beltway more often, places they
can’t reach traveling hub-to-hub by air.
President George W. Bush
touted the new law as a way to force states and local school boards to improve
the quality of the nation’s education. Yet, it’s left states with rural
schools in a pickle.
The new law will deprive
Idaho of $440 million if its teachers do not meet federal standards by the end
of the 2005-2006 school year. That’s a big chunk of change in a state where
the blood shed on the floor of the Capitol during budget debates is still wet.
The law could also leave the
state with fewer teachers and rural districts with crushing expenses. Idaho
could lose 600 teachers if standards are enforced—a hard loss in a state that
struggles to recruit enough teachers in rural areas.
The standards call for
teachers in core subjects to have a bachelor’s degree in each subject they
teach.
The law also contains a
school choice provision that requires that students in schools with low test
scores be allowed to transfer to schools with higher test scores—at the
district’s expense.
In big cities with a large
pool of certified teachers and multiple schools, the standards make sense. In
thousands of rural communities across the nation, the standards are unworkable.
Rural towns, including many
in Idaho, find it difficult to recruit teachers—any teachers. Consequently,
teachers in rural districts commonly teach across disciplines. For example, a
single teacher with a degree in biology may teach chemistry, physics and earth
sciences as well.
Under the law, this teacher
would have to have a degree in all of the disciplines or risk losing their job.
The kicker? Many rural teachers are paid so little they can’t afford the
additional education—or the time off necessary to complete it.
Alaska’s representatives
point out that to transfer a student from an under-performing rural school in
their state to a school with a better performance rating could require a
district to foot the bill for daily plane flights from backcountry areas with
difficult conditions.
The law would leave thousands
of rural children with fewer and poorer educational options than they have now.
The president and federal
lawmakers put rural schools into this pickle; they must get them out—and fast.