Future of Elkhorn
is still unclear
Sun Valley Council delays zoning
changes
By GREGORY FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
Sun Valley City Council members last week
delayed taking action on a set of proposed zoning changes for the city’s two
commercial-zoned village centers.
In their second review of proposed changes
put forth by the city Planning and Zoning Commission, council members on
Thursday, May 15, could not agree on conditions that would require that
commercial space be built as a part of new developments in the Commercial Center
zoning district.
The City Council last December approved a
moratorium on new applications for development projects in the CC district and
asked the P&Z to consider how to limit applications that propose only
residential uses—rather than the intended mix of residential and commercial
uses. The original 120-day moratorium expired last month but was renewed by the
council to allow for continued negotiations on the matter.
The CC district includes the cores of
Elkhorn Village and Sun Valley Village.
The debate on the proposal Thursday
focused on whether the city should require that commercial space and affordable
housing be required elements of new projects in the village cores.
Council President Latham Williams
indicated he is reluctant to have the city require that commercial space be
built as part of all new developments.
Councilwoman Ann Agnew said she wants to
mandate that some commercial space is a required element of new projects.
The city’s most recent draft of the
proposal would require that 100 square feet of floor space "devoted to retail or
service businesses" be required for every residential unit built in new
developments.
A contingent of representatives from
CG-Elkhorn LLC—the company that is planning to redevelop the former Elkhorn
Hotel site—said a survey of Elkhorn residents indicated that there might be
demand for up to 9,050 square feet of commercial space in the village core. The
survey of 1,400 residents—which garnered 607 responses—showed that local
property owners would be most likely to support a restaurant, general store or
coffee shop in the village.
Jeff Russell, principal representative for
CG-Elkhorn, said the company would be willing to build affordable housing and
commercial space but would like some "flexibility" in developing buildings that
are 64-feet high—the current maximum in the CC district.
CG-Elkhorn representative David Hennessy
concurred, noting that a generous requirement for commercial space could exceed
the demand for such property. "We want to do commercial. We think it’s right for
the project, it’s right for Elkhorn…We just don’t want to have empty
storefronts."
He said the current incarnation of the
company’s project calls for approximately 110 residential units in "19 or 20"
buildings—only "three or four" of which might reach 64 feet.
Councilman Lud Renick said he was
concerned that the city—in discussing the proposed amendments to the zoning
ordinance with the CG-Elkhorn representatives—might be "tailoring" the
regulations to a single development project.
Officials from Sun Valley Co.—the owner of
the majority of Sun Valley’s CC-zoned property—have essentially declined city
invitations to participate in discussions about the proposed zoning amendments.
Ketchum resident Mickey Garcia suggested
that the city should require affordable housing but let free-market influences
govern the development of commercial space. "The city of Sun Valley and the city
of Ketchum are doing a poor job at getting affordable housing," he said.
Council members indicated they would
resume their discussion of the matter at their next monthly meeting.