Will Cheney reclusiveness end?
Commentary by PAT MURPHY
Dick Cheney is a man suited for the
superlatives he’s compiled over time.
Among all U.S. vice presidents, Cheney is
the most widely experienced (serving formerly as a congressman, White House
aide, Defense Secretary, vice president, corporate CEO), the wealthiest (he
received a $30 million stock payoff when he resigned from Halliburton in 2000),
and the unhealthiest (he has had several heart attacks and relies on a heart
Pacemaker), although several presidents were sicker.
He’s also by far the most reclusive in a
job requiring occupants to be constantly seen if not always heard.
Other vice presidents in my
lifetime—Garner, Wallace, Truman, Barkley, Nixon, Johnson, Humphrey, Agnew,
Ford, Rockefeller, Mondale, Bush, Quayle, Gore—were highly visible and
accessible.
So, with al-Qaeda broken (as President
Bush says), with Iraq conquered, and with stringent domestic security measures
in place, will Vice President Cheney end his secretive lifestyle and return to
the public stage for a Bush-Cheney campaign?
Cheney has been retreating to an
"undisclosed" hiding place during the terrorism scare most of his term. The
official explanation is baffling, however.
Is Dick Cheney less expendable and more
vulnerable than the President of the United States, who’s out and about making
speeches and glad-handing, and even landing in a jet on an aircraft carrier?
(An aside: Democratic demands for an
investigation into the politics of "Top Gun" Bush’s carrier landing is as
pathetic as the infantile Republican demand for investigating whether President
Clinton held up Air Force One on a Los Angeles International Airport taxiway in
1993 while a celebrity hair stylist gave him a $200 trim.)
Uncharitable partisans would nod yes—that
Cheney is indispensable because he does most White House thinking, composes key
legislation, and pushes major personnel appointments, and without him, Bush
would be lost.
Cheney usually emerges to appear only in
friendly venues, then hurries off. What few questions he answers of Washington
media is not in press conferences, to which even the reluctant President Bush
submits, but on one-on-one television Sunday talk shows not as aggressive as
White House press free-for-alls. Even on rare occasions when he appears to break
tie votes in the Senate, he takes a quick powder after the tally.
In Washington circles, cynics say the
explanation is that Cheney is dodging questions about Halliburton, the
corporation he captained.
Halliburton is under fire for questionable
accounting procedures, for multi-million dollar no-bid contracts in Iraq even
before the shooting is over, and for a $2.4 million bribe Halliburton paid in
Nigeria for favorable tax treatment (the bribe reportedly was paid after Cheney
left Halliburton).
Most Americans probably care less about
questions involving Halliburton than why Cheney is so furtive and shadowy as
vice president.
Washington reporters, who seem cowered by
Bush & Co., have avoided asking. Maybe the Democratic 2004 vice presidential
candidate will muster courage to ask Cheney why he’s more inaccessible than even
the president.
That is, assuming Cheney emerges from
reclusiveness to take part in political debates in the 2004 campaign.