White Cloud grazing
to be trimmed
Forest Service cites environmental,
recreation concerns
By GREG STAHL
Express Staff Writer
In response to growing concerns about the
impacts of cattle grazing on streams, wetlands, sensitive plant and animal
species and on recreation, the U.S. Forest Service is proposing to reduce the
size and scope of grazing allotments on the east slope of the White Cloud
Mountains by roughly half.
The action could adversely affect five
ranchers who graze cattle on the Upper and Lower East Fork allotments, which are
located on the Sawtooth and Challis national forests in the East Fork of the
Salmon River drainage. The allotments are within the borders of the Sawtooth
National Recreation Area, which spans the Boise, Sawtooth and Salmon-Challis
national forests.
"Analysis of the current condition of the
two allotments has found that the SNRA primary values are being impacted,"
according to a Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the Upper and Lower East
Fork grazing allotments. "Impacts from livestock to fisheries, wildlife and
vegetation, and conflicts with recreationists are occurring, indicating a need
for change in current livestock management practices."
SNRA Area Ranger Debora Cooper was careful
to point out that many of the grazing impacts in the East Fork valley are
because of limitations posed by steep, rocky, high elevation terrain. She also
pointed out that ranchers in the area are grazing roughly half the number of
cattle each season than their permits specify.
"Our inability to achieve desired
conditions under current management by both the Forest Service and permitees is
not about finding and placing blame, but it is about conditions that are
inherent to the terrain," Cooper said. "The majority of the land involved with
these two allotments is very steep, rocky, covered with timber and exceedingly
difficult to manage."
Cooper said that, of the 131,317 acres in
the two allotments, approximately 20 to 30 percent of the land produces abundant
forage, is close to water and is not too steep to graze livestock.
"Historically, these allotments were
managed for sheep grazing," Cooper said. "Back in the 1960s, these sheep
allotments were converted to cattle allotments. So far we have been unable to
achieve desired conditions across all acres of each allotment—conditions that
meet the Forest Plan standards and mandates from Congress."
The draft EIS was prepared to identify
social and environmental issues and to study possible management actions and the
effects they might have. The document outlines three alternatives: no change
from current management, reduced numbers of livestock along with smaller grazing
allotments or a ban on public lands grazing in the area.
The Forest Service’s preferred
alternative--an approximately 66 percent reduction in grazing on the Upper East
Fork and a 57 percent reduction in grazing on the Lower East Fork--may be
unpopular in Custer County, where agriculture and mining have long been
significant economic engines.
"Agriculture and related activities
provide the major economic base for Custer County," according to the draft EIS.
"Specific agricultural activities associated with ranching and farming are
considered by many of the local people as the economic mainstay of the county."
According to Forest Service documents,
agriculture and agriculture related services comprised approximately 190 of the
1,220 jobs in Challis in 2000. Mining ranked first with 217 jobs in 2000.
Ranchers in the East Fork area did not
return the Mountain Express’ phone calls, and Idaho Cattle Association officials
were not available to comment early this week.
Cooper stressed that, though the Forest
Service has cited a proposed alternative, she has not yet come to a decision.
She said she sincerely wants to hear from the public regarding all of the
alternatives.
"The decision that I am facing is not an
easy one, nor is it simple," she said. "We will continue to listen carefully to
all interests. We do this because we not only have legislated mandates to
properly manage these natural resources, but we care deeply about the effect our
decisions have on the lifestyles and economic well-being of all who use and
depend on our national forests."
The area in question is very special to a
lot of people, she added.
"We cannot continue with the current
management. Changes must take place if the Forest Service is to meet their
responsibilities under the law as well as providing the opportunity for the
permittees to maintain a viable grazing operation."
According to the Forest Service, a number
of changes have occurred since grazing allotment management plans were finalized
for the east slope of the White Clouds in the 1970s. Most of the changes have
prompted increased scrutiny.
They include new standards in the 1987
Sawtooth National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, a number of fish and
wildlife species listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act,
increased recreation and associated conflicts with livestock and the conversion
of allotments from sheep to cattle.
"Every allotment has its challenges, but I
don’t think there’s any allotment on the SNRA that’s as difficult to manage as
these two," Cooper said.