Ketchum hotel plan
sent back to P&Z
By GREG STAHL
Express Staff Writer
Casting a deciding opinion Jan. 29,
Ketchum City Councilman Randy Hall gave a new downtown hotel proposal a negative
review and effectively sank the 81-room, four-story, 55- to 59-foot-tall hotel’s
potential to be built as proposed.
Without the votes to approve Ketchum
attorney Brian Barsotti’s proposed Bald Mountain Hotel, the city council
unanimously voted to remand an associated planned unit development application
to the Ketchum Planning and Zoning Commission. Hall and Councilwoman Chris
Potters said the proposed building’s height must be curbed to gain approval.
Barsotti was clearly not happy with the
council’s decision, but said he would take another look at building a hotel or
motel at the site on Main Street. He said a franchise-operated motel, without
first floor conference and restaurant facilities, might work.
"We’re kind of regrouping, and the
architect’s taking a look at a motel or a 100 percent residential project,"
Barsotti said.
The Bald Mountain Hotel proposal was under
review by the city of Ketchum for a year, and public opposition to the proposed
hotel’s height, which was 19 feet higher than allowed by law, surfaced
relatively late in the process. However, city council meetings held on the
proposal in January were some of the best attended in Ketchum’s recent history.
Barsotti proposed to raze the historic
Bald Mountain Lodge, which occupies an entire city block and fronts the city’s
Main Street. Regardless of what happens to the hotel proposal, the historic
lodge will be torn down, Barsotti said.
At the Jan. 29 meeting, Councilman Baird
Gourlay excused himself from the proceedings, because Barsotti owns the building
in which Gourlay operates a business. It is not a legal conflict of interest,
said Ketchum City Attorney Margaret Simms, but Gourlay said he would not subject
himself or his family to the public scrutiny he anticipated.
In previous meetings, Councilman Maurice
Charlat made clear that he would probably vote for the hotel as requested.
Potters made clear that she would not vote for any building taller than the
city’s 40-foot height limit.
That left the decision up to Hall.
"I am in the hot seat," Hall acknowledged
Wednesday night before reading a lengthy statement.
"I find that the benefits being requested
by the developer would not be equal to the benefits that the city of Ketchum
would receive," Hall said. "To be more specific, we would be giving away the
heart and soul of our comprehensive plan and our design review ordinance. And
for what?
"Will Ketchum receive some benefit from
having this project go forward? Yes. Will we get some visitors circulating
through town spending money? Yes. Will we receive some increase in our local
option tax as a result? Yes. But I have to ask myself, ‘Would those benefits be
any different with a hotel built within the guidelines?’ The answer is also
yes."
Hall’s statement was received by a lengthy
round of applause from the approximately 80 citizens in attendance.
Barsotti said he was annoyed with the way
Hall handled the issue.
"He’s a politician, and he played it to
the hilt," Barsotti said. "We negotiated with ourselves for four months."