Tom Hanks threatens builder with
‘astronomical’ lawsuit
By GREG MOORE
Express Staff Writer
Hollywood couple Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson
have threatened a Ketchum contractor with a multi-million-dollar,
invasion-of-privacy lawsuit after he sued them to collect on an allegedly unpaid
$1.75 million construction bill.
Storey Construction Inc., which built the
couple’s home north of Ketchum, filed the suit Jan 3 in Fifth District Court in
Hailey. In a brief filed Thursday, Storey’s attorney, Miles Stanislaw, stated
that his client has not been informed of the reasons for the defendants’ alleged
refusal to pay the bill, which was for additional work done on the home.
According to Storey’s court complaint, the
home includes several guesthouses, a swimming pool, a tennis court and 11 acres
of landscaping. The firm completed its work there on Nov. 14.
During a court hearing Friday, Hanks and
Wilson’s Hailey attorney, Ned Williamson, sought for the second time to have the
court file sealed. The matter was left unresolved due to procedural
deficiencies.
However, Williamson told the court that
the July 2000 construction contract requires confidential, binding arbitration
of any dispute. One of the purposes of that provision, he said, was to keep
Hanks and Wilson’s names and address out of the courts. Williamson contended
that Storey’s filing of its suit constitutes a breach of the contract.
Stanislaw stated in his brief that he had
received a six-page letter dated Jan. 4 from Hanks and Wilson’s Boise attorney,
Geoffrey J. McConnell, threatening to sue Storey.
"If your client does not immediately
stipulate to sealing the record in the Hanks/Wilson matter, and additional media
catches wind of this lawsuit resulting in the publication of my clients’ address
or otherwise enabling stalkers to find our clients, both you and your client
will face liability and damages …" the letter states.
"If our clients are physically or
emotionally harmed in any way by Storey’s reckless actions, all responsible
parties will be liable for invasion of privacy, breach of confidence, reckless
endangerment and a host of other causes of action, and the damages associated
therewith will be astronomical."
"…if an injury—or even a real threat of
injury—occurs to Mr. Hanks or to his family as a result of the disclosures in
Storey’s complaint, Mr. Hanks’ ability and freedom to work will be greatly
affected. Given that Mr. Hanks makes millions of dollars per picture, the
potential damages to you and your client would be tremendous."
The letter states that the filing of the
suit had caused Hanks and Wilson to take additional, expensive security
measures.
It also contends that Storey filed a
lawsuit, rather than relying on confidential arbitration, to pressure the couple
into a settlement.
The suit is the second that has been filed
on the matter. The contract to build the couple’s home was between Storey and
trust formed for that purpose, which Stanislaw called an "alter ego" for Hanks
and Wilson. An earlier suit naming the trust as defendant was filed Dec. 12, but
included a request for a stay of the proceedings pending an attempt at
arbitration.
In court Friday, Stanislaw said Hanks and
Wilson’s attorney had declined his request for arbitration. As a result, he
said, he filed the second suit against Hanks and Wilson personally.
A brief filed by Williamson on Thursday,
however, contends that Hanks and Wilson accepted a Dec. 30 demand for
arbitration.
"Therefore, the action at bar—which was
filed less than a week thereafter—should never have been filed," the brief
states.
It adds that trust was created to avoid
any public disclosure of Hanks and Wilson’s address, and that the contract
describes the project as "Church Camp 2." During a court hearing on Jan. 10,
Stanislaw agreed to keep the address confidential, but opposed sealing the
entire file.
"The mere fact that Mr. Hanks is a
celebrity does not and should not entitle him to special treatment that would
not be afforded to a local insurance broker, school teacher, dentist, mechanic,
store clerk, rancher or ski instructor that was sued for collection of a debt,"
Stanislaw wrote in his Jan. 23 brief.
The brief states that subcontractors and
suppliers who are still owed money for the job have a right to remain informed
as to the suit’s progress. In court Friday, Stanislaw said those debts amount to
about $700,000.
He also contended that like many other
celebrities, the couple has made no effort to live a secretive life here, and
did not rely on the trust to do business related to the construction project.
"Wilson regularly came to this
construction site, ordered changed work (and) ordered additional work," he said.
The defendants’ effort to seal the file
was left inconclusive Friday after it became apparent that no motion had been
made to do so. Williamson said he had only recently taken over the case, and
stated in his brief that the previous attorney, McConnell, had not filed motion
papers due to Storey’s refusal to commit to keeping their contents confidential.
Judge James May told Williamson he would reconsider the matter if Williamson
files a motion.