Keep highway decisions in the open
No other capital improvement project will
forever change the entire character of the Wood River Valley for years to come
as much as the final decision on how and where state Highway 75 will be widened
and improved to accommodate more traffic.
Yet, the recent decision by the Idaho
Department of Transportation and its consultants to drop further consideration
of two of five alternative designs was done after a December workshop with
unnamed public officials and without adequate notice to the public.
IDT might very well have satisfactory
grounds for eliminating two alternatives. But the decision should be made after
genuine public hearings where robust back and forth debate would prevent
suspicions that decisions were being made in secret.
IDT has held a series of "open houses"
where citizens can wander through a maze of illustrated proposals for Highway
75’s ultimate new design and write comments on cards.
But these are a far cry from, and a poor
substitute for, public hearings where IDT officials and consultants would be
required to respond to questions of larger audiences sharing views aloud.
By eliminating alternatives, at what
amounts to an unnoticed meeting involving public officials, only casts doubts on
the motives of IDT and its consultants as well as the integrity of the ultimate
design decision.