Elk do not need
supplemental feed
in winter
Guest opinion
by DAVID PARRISH
David Parrish
is the Magic Valley regional supervisor for the Idaho Department of Fish and
Game.
Recently, Wood
River Valley newspapers published several articles and letters soliciting funds
to feed elk during the winter. While the individuals promoting winter elk
feeding undoubtedly have good intentions, their efforts are counterproductive in
the long-term and not in the best interest of the valley’s elk population.
Often, the public
equates winter survival and feeding of elk to feeding of domestic livestock.
This is a poor analogy. Except in extreme, emergency situations Wood River elk
do not need supplemental feed during winter. Elk, along with other native
wildlife, have developed strategies to survive harsh winter conditions. These
strategies include seasonal fat reserves to provide winter energy, reduced
winter metabolic rates, and use of thermal cover to minimize core body heat
loss.
Disturbance by
pets or people that increase deer or elk avoidance activity result in animals
burning their fat reserves on avoidance rather than survival. Supplemental
winter-feeding often pulls elk away from their traditional winter ranges and
compromises their natural survival capabilities. Feeding concentrates them where
mortality from predators, disease, vehicles, and other human activities
increases. In addition, concentrating elk near residences results in substantial
damage to landscaping and private property.
The concentration
of elk on feed grounds increases the probability of disease transmission. On
native range, elk tend to spread out and do not have as much direct contact with
each other. Often, elk that contract a fatal disease will isolate themselves
from herds due to their inability to forage. A diseased elk that survives and
locates on a feeding site tends to provide a vector to expose a large segment of
the elk population to the fatal pathogen. Although our knowledge about the
transmission of fatal diseases such as tuberculosis, chronic wasting disease,
and brucellosis are limited, we do know that chances for the diseases spreading
are much high(er) in populations brought into direct contact with each other in
confined feeding situations. In recent years, brucellosis has been detected in
winter-fed elk in eastern Idaho, putting at risk Idaho’s brucellosis-free
status. The state of Idaho is now involved in an expensive program to trap and
test fed elk and destroy those elk that test positive for brucellosis. Feeding
in the Big Wood Valley increases the probability that disease testing will be
necessary in upcoming years at considerable expense.
When elk are
lured away from native habitat to artificial feed, their natural winter use
patterns are altered and they often return year after year to locations where
they were fed. A prime example of long-term effects can be seen at the Golden
Eagle Ranch Subdivision where more than 10 years ago well-meaning Wood River
residents established an unnecessary elk feed site. Now that feeding has
stopped, elk continue to migrate to the site expecting forage. Instead, they
find homes with palatable trees and shrubs used for landscaping. Homeowners now
must deal with the expense and inconvenience of elk foraging for food. Adequate
native winter range for these elk is available in the hills above the
subdivision. Last year, a limited amount of hazing of elk was allowed in an
attempt to condition elk to stay away from the subdivision. This year we are
encouraging homeowners to protect individual trees and shrubs by wrapping them
with protective materials. Active harassment of elk at Golden Eagle Ranch
Subdivision will not be an option this coming winter.
The Fish and Game’s
management objective for the Wood River elk herd is to have as many elk as can
be supported on native winter range. As elk feeding activities increase in the
valley, the result is increased harvest levels and lower elk numbers. The
Department has a responsibility to manage elk at a level that is compatible with
the urban expansion that is occurring in the valley. Maintaining elk at
artificially high numbers with winter-feeding is not part of that objective.
Over the past 15 years, the urbanization of the valley has reduced the number of
elk that can be supported during winter. However, adequate habitat currently
exists to support a substantial elk herd without winter-feeding. The solution is
to work together to avoid winter-feeding and domestication of this valuable
wildlife resource and to conserve and protect the habitat elk need to flourish.
The Department
has a policy to only feed wildlife under emergency conditions. The Magic Valley
Winter Feeding Advisory Group in conjunction with the Department has developed
criteria that define "emergency conditions". These criteria consider
both the biological needs of elk and social issues and are intended to be used
as guidelines to help determine when supplemental winter-feeding is necessary.
Recently, state
Rep. Wendy Jaquet, D-Ketchum, pulled together a diverse group interested in elk
management and developed a document entitled "Wood River Elk
Management." This document identifies the protection and management of elk
habitat as one of the top priorities for maintaining future healthy elk
populations in the valley. We suggest you get a copy of that plan and see how
you might help implement some the its ideas and recommendations. If you want to
make a contribution of money to benefit Wood River Valley elk populations,
please consider donating to organizations such as the Wood River Chapter of the
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation or the Wood River Land Trust. Their work to secure
and improve winter range for the benefit of wild elk populations is the best
strategy to provide elk for the future in the Wood River Valley.