Bellevue mayor
comes under fire
Zoning compliance
of
developments questioned
By GREGORY
FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
A former mayor of
Bellevue last week demanded that the City Council investigate whether five
houses developed for sale by Mayor John Barton are compliant with the city’s
zoning ordinance.
Monte Brothwell,
who has served as mayor and on the Bellevue City Council, issued a letter to the
council Thursday that claimed Barton has unfairly benefited from building and
selling single-family homes that do not include the mandated number of
off-street parking spaces.
The letter was
read into the public record by Councilman Wayne Douthit during the onset of
Thursday’s City Council meeting. The document immediately sparked a debate
among council members as to whether the panel should be asked to review a matter
that might normally be addressed by the city building inspector.
At issue are five
houses in central Bellevue that the mayor and his wife Janet Barton in the last
year have sold or prepared to sell.
Brothwell last
week asserted that two of the homes which sold last summer provided no
off-street parking, and thereby violate city regulations that require certain
homes to have two off-street parking spaces. In addition, Brothwell said that
three other homes being completed for sale also have inadequate off-street
parking.
Brothwell said
the city’s parking requirements are arbitrarily enforced, and should apply to
all residents, including the mayor.
"At this
point I feel the council needs to address this discriminatory practice," he
noted in the letter. "There should be an immediate letter sent to the
developer to abide by the ordinance that anybody else has to."
In the letter,
Brothwell apologized for not being able to attend the meeting and requested that
Barton remove himself from the discussion of the matter.
Barton declined
to leave as Douthit read the letter.
Brothwell’s
letter immediately drew strong statements from Council President Parke Mitchell,
who suggested that the issue was an inappropriate matter to be brought before
the council.
"I get the
sense this is sort of a personal vendetta against the mayor," Mitchell
said.
Councilman
Douthit said he believed the questions raised by Brothwell were legitimate.
"It concerns me," he said.
Mitchell added
that he thought city staff, not the council, should handle the matter. "I
don’t think it belongs in this room," he said.
Councilwoman
Tammy Schofield issued a motion that the matter be tabled while an investigation
is conducted to determine if proper procedures were followed in the development
of the homes. The motion was seconded by Councilman Jon Anderson, and was
immediately approved by the panel.
After the
meeting, Mitchell reiterated that he believes the council should not handle the
matter. "I think this is a matter that should be settled by the building
official or the Planning Department," he said.
However, Barton
on Monday said he thought the council should participate in the review of the
situation.
"It is my
understanding that Monte was asking the council to apply additional scrutiny to
the developments," Barton said. "As an elected official, I welcome
that additional scrutiny. I think it would be appropriate for the council to
look at."
Later in Thursday’s
meeting, during a discussion of whether the council should approve a new set of
modified parking requirements for various types of developments in the city, a
second—and considerably longer—letter submitted by Brothwell angered
Mitchell and Councilman Jon Wilkes.
In that letter
Brothwell asserted that a new proposed parking ordinance submitted by the
Planning and Zoning Commission could potentially hurt business.
"I find it
laborious, tenuous, and a few other words," Wilkes said.
With the panel
ultimately divided over the plan, council members voted 4-2 to continue the
discussion at a future meeting.