Chamber members
frown on LOT increase
By GREG
STAHL
Express Staff Writer
Raising
Ketchum’s local option tax by 1 percent is not proving to be a popular
idea.
In light
of a soft economic environment nationwide, the majority of business
owners responding to a recent Sun Valley-Ketchum Chamber and Visitors
Bureau survey said they are very hesitant to support any increase in the
local option tax in Ketchum.
Mayor Ed
Simon suggested the increase earlier this year as a means for the city
to purchase land, but he did not specify potential uses for that land.
The
voter-approved sales tax is a levy allowed only in Idaho’s resort
communities. In Ketchum, the LOT totals 1 percent on retail sales, 2
percent on lodging, 2 percent on liquor by-the-drink and 1 percent on
building materials.
The city
of Sun Valley has a separate, 3 percent local option sales tax on
lodging, liquor and retail sales. On a ballot measure Tuesday, Sun
Valley citizens were asked to extend the tax through 2010. Any increase
in Ketchum also would need voter approval.
Ketchum
collects nearly $2 million in LOT annually, and visitors to the area pay
approximately 68 percent of the tax, according to a 2001 Blaine County
economic study.
Of the
approximately 600 member businesses that were mailed surveys, 64
responded, and, of those, 71 percent did not approve of the proposed 1
percent increase. Another 28 percent of the respondents favored the
increase.
Most of
those who did not approve of the increase are those directly affected by
the tax, CVB Executive Director Carol Waller said.
"Many
respondents wrote in specific comments regarding their positions, and,
not surprisingly, some of those opinions were quite different,"
Waller said. "However, the most common sentiment was that
increasing the tax now would have a very negative impact on the local
business environment and economy, especially since the Idaho state
Legislature is considering raising the state sales tax to make up for
budget shortfalls this next year."
Many of
those who responded also said they were concerned that no specific
purpose has been identified for the additional revenue the city would
collect.
"The
need for generating additional income for the city was not perceived as
critical," Waller said.
Waller
said the 11 percent response to the survey is considered good, but
Ketchum City Councilman Maurice Charlat questioned whether the study’s
results are predictable.
Acknowledging
that the will of the area’s business owners was very clear in the
survey results, Charlat said he is still "relatively
convinced" that the city would vote to increase the tax for a
limited time for the right project.
Anonymous
survey comments match Charlat’s observation.
"I
don’t support it, because I don’t know where we (the mayor and city
council) are going to spend the additional revenue," one respondent
said.
Other
comments indicated that parks, affordable housing or Warm Springs Golf
Course preservation could be acceptable expenditures if a 1-percent
increase were approved.
"Before
it is possible to consider this proposal, the city should explain what
the land acquisition is for, why this is the best use for a LOT
increase, and what the projected impact would be on the Ketchum economy
and businesses, given that we are already in a recession!" another
respondent wrote. "How could we possibly vote on such a proposal
without the basic information?"