Voters need help
If
incumbent political candidates could live up to their improbable boasts
as valiant defenders of morality and guardians of the public purse, who
make noble sacrifices for the public good, they’d be saints instead.
Unfortunately,
the hyperbole of clever advertising is a stranger to the unvarnished
truth about their performance. In the end, voters are left to rely on
advertising images and slogans on Election Day rather than a thorough
knowledge of candidates.
Something
of a model remedy to the void in information is at work in Pennsylvania,
where a nonpartisan web site (www.issuepa.net)
focuses primarily on the race for governor by exploring issues as well
as providing voters with a forum for helping shape policy while boning
up on the candidates’ positions.
It’s
not cheap. But keeping democracy robust is a worthwhile investment.
Major funds have come from the Heinz Endowment ($500,000), Pew
Charitable Trusts ($640,000), the Pittsburgh Foundation ($100,000) and
William Penn Foundation ($35,000) along with support from the widely
regarded 66-year-old Pennsylvania Economy League and its 250 business
leader members.
This
full-time, ongoing analysis of elected officials’ public activities is
especially needed in Idaho, where Republicans have had a hammerlock on
state government, and thus are less subject to vigorous oversight and
opposition.
Newspapers
and academics make gallant efforts at election time to analyze political
performance. But the intricacy of governance and legislation is so
complex (and often devious) that without daily monitoring by
sophisticated specialists, an analysis of paper trails—campaign
contributions and quid pro quo favors to donors, unfulfilled public
promises and the like—is virtually impossible.
Add this
to the list of needed Idaho public activities—a nonpartisan public
interest group dedicated to compiling the real performance of
politicians, not what they claim.