When power blinds
public responsibility
Was state
Senate candidate Tom Faulkner attempting levity, albeit lame, with his
declaration in an Idaho Mountain Express interview that Idaho has a
two-party system—"liberal Republicans and conservative
Republicans"?
Or does
Faulkner, a Republican challenging incumbent state Sen. Clint Stennett,
believe in his heart of hearts that a state government dominated by
Republicans with only shades of difference in their thinking is as good
as it gets for Idaho?
The
former view is not amusing and the latter is frightening.
Republican
lawmakers not only reign with an iron hand by having a majority, but
also rule through another clever artifice—the closed caucus where GOP
legislators can decide well in advance what legislation will be
discussed, how it will be discussed, and how members will vote.
This
backroom political sanitizing of the usual unpredictable give-and-take
of legislating makes a mockery of public hearings that Republicans seem
to treat as little more than window dressing, not genuine opportunities
for the public to argue its case with sympathetic ears and open minds.
Republicans
should open their caucuses. The Democratic minority in the House opened
its party caucus two sessions ago; Senate Democrats opened theirs this
past session.
So, the
press and others interested in what Democrats discuss before formal
sessions may eavesdrop. Openness serves to prevent rigging votes or
stifling party dissent in advance.
If this
misuse of overwhelming power and secrecy by the dominant Republican
majority benefits pet GOP interests and muffles dissent within its
ranks, it works against the best interests of Idahoans.
One test
is for Idahoans to ask: Is their state better off today after years and
years of GOP rule and lack of balance?
Decidedly
not.
With only
a handful of Democrat legislators challenging Republican policies, the
reigning majority can run roughshod over any opposition, imposing its
will and along the way making decisions and creating policy with dire
long-range consequences.
Surely
the mediocrity that Idaho suffers in national rankings and the shortfall
in its services are results of misuses of absolute political power and
an indifference to public needs and higher public expectations.
Idaho’s
current dismal—and worsening—financial crisis is the ultimate
fulfillment of Lord Acton’s oft-repeated cautionary maxim that
"Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts
absolutely," even if the corruption is ineptness and judgment.