Sun Valley
P&Z delays vote on Elkhorn school
Measures to
reduce traffic,
noise still at issue
By GREGORY
FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
Sitting
before a packed chambers Tuesday, Sun Valley Planning and Zoning
commissioners voted unanimously to continue to a future date their
consideration of an application by The Community School to construct and
operate a new elementary school on its Sagewillow campus in Elkhorn.
Architect
Mark Cork shows Sun Valley P&Z commissioners changes made to a
design for a new elementary school at The Community School’s
Sagewillow campus. Looking on are project manager Lori Labrum, right,
and P&Z Commissioner Ken Herich. Express photos by Willy Cook
"What
I’ve seen, I don’t believe will work," Commissioner Blair Boand
said, echoing sentiments of other commissioners that efforts made by
project representatives to mitigate the effects of vehicle traffic and
noise were inadequate.
The move
by commissioners to continue their review of the project was the fifth
of its kind, with four previous meetings in May and June ending in the
same result.
However,
in rendering a 6-0 decision to resume a public hearing on the school’s
proposal at a regular P&Z meeting Dec. 10, all members of the panel
suggested that they are not inherently opposed to the plan to locate a
school at the approximately 30-acre site.
Project
supporter Joan Lamb said a new campus for The Community School would
be an asset to Sun Valley, and urged opponents of the plan to consider
relocating away from the proposed site in Elkhorn. Express photos by
Willy Cook
After
campus neighbor and project opponent Douglas Carnahan demanded that the
panel "drive a stake in the ground" and vote against the
application for a Conditional Use Permit for the school, P&Z
Chairman Jim McLaughlin asked each member whether he might vote in favor
of the plan if significant mitigation measures were made to address a
long list of concerns raised by a large contingent of Elkhorn residents.
One by
one, commissioners said they could—in concept—support construction
of a school at the site if strict, well-defined conditions were
developed and included in the permit.
Before
calling for a motion to table the plan, McLaughlin outlined a specific
list of issues that the P&Z wants addressed by the applicants before
the matter is discussed again in December. He demanded that the school’s
project representative, Lori Labrum, and attorney, J. Evan Robertson,
work to reduce future car traffic into the neighborhood; devise ways to
lessen the noise impacts of the proposed school; design additional
parking areas; redesign a proposed bike path configured to link with the
city path system; outline the number of school-related events slated to
take place at the site, and provide a detailed construction schedule for
the three-phase project.
As the
first phase of the plan to develop a new elementary school campus at the
outdoor/recreation-zoned site, The Community School proposed to
construct:
-
Three
new structures between the site’s existing soccer fields,
including a 6,790-square-foot administration and education building,
a 4,550-square-foot "community room" and a
9,800-square-foot, two-story classroom building.
-
An
800-square-foot caretaker’s residence northwest of the main
development.
-
A
168-square-foot observatory, also northwest of the campus center.
-
A
bike path to link the campus to the primary city path along Elkhorn
Road.
-
Several
road improvements, a new access road, and a noise-mitigation fence
and new landscaping.
Additional
phases would include a library, additional classrooms and a
multi-purpose structure. Opening-year enrollment was proposed to be 132
students, and enrollment upon completion of the entire development was
set at 190 students.
School
headmaster Jon Maksik on Monday estimated the entire project would cost
approximately $10 million. He said the school would like to open the new
facility in 2004.
Labrum
and Robertson Tuesday presented to the P&Z several revisions to the
plan which were designed to meet demands made by commissioners during
their last hearing on the application June 25. The representatives told
the panel they devised a plan to bus to school some 40 willing students
living in the southern part of the Wood River Valley to decrease the
amount of car traffic on Arrowleaf Road— the main access road to the
campus.
Labrum
said the busing program would be implemented next year to and from the
existing Trail Creek campus, and then extended to the new Sagewillow
site.
A city
report on the busing plan noted that the applicants estimated that the
initiative would decrease car trips to the Sagewillow campus by
approximately 47-percent, from 806 total trips to 432 trips.
"I
think the school is willing to commit to growing the bus system,"
Robertson said.
City
Administrator Dan Pincetich said he did not believe the proposed busing
program would provide a nearly 50-decrease in traffic, noting that many
parents might still visit the campus during school hours.
During a
spirited public hearing, several Sagewillow area residents said they
thought the measures offered by the applicants to reduce traffic and
noise—including the busing plan—were entirely inadequate.
"The
location of a campus in Elkhorn seems ludicrous at best," said
neighborhood resident Charlie Foss, noting that he believed a campus
located south of Sun Valley would be more appropriate.
Carnahan,
a resident of Arrowleaf Road, said he thought the mitigation measures
proposed by the applicants were "piecemeal" and would be
difficult to monitor. "The proposal is just not a good fit for
them, or for their neighbors that they would have," he said.
Some of
the approximately 75 attendees at the meeting did speak in favor of the
new school. "Young kids love to ride on buses," said Joan
Lamb, a member of the school’s parents’ association.
Immediately
before the panel chose to continue the hearing, Pincetich suggested that
commissioners set an absolute limit on the number of cars that can
access the campus at 300 or 400.
In
response, McLaughlin scheduled for Wednesday, Oct. 23, a special P&Z
workshop meeting to discuss traffic capacity at the site.