Time to scrap
forest fee demo program
Guest
opinion by SCOTT PHILLIPS
Momentum
is building to terminate the grossly undemocratic U.S. Forest fee demo
program. Scott Silver, leader of national opposition to fee demo,
obtained access to internal survey forms from 2,240 Forest Service
employees in Region 6 (Oregon and Washington). On the Deschutes National
Forest, in particular, there were some "don’t know" and
"neutral" votes but, employees still weighed in roughly 2-1 in
opposition. Opposition was slightly less pronounced on other forests.
The
opposing Forest Service employees were uniquely concerned that fee demo
is giving the Forest Service a black eye, that the Forest Service is
losing credibility, and that their handling of fee-demo is engendering
ill will toward the agency. Here are a few direct quotes.
"The
program will continue to be immensely unpopular and cause civil
disobedience …"
"It
should be scrapped and Congress pressed to properly fund
recreation!"
"People
see it as a ploy to get money, creating a negative image of the Forest
Service."
"Forests
are not Disneyland and people should not be charged for
Recreation."
On Sept.
16, a class action lawsuit was filed in southern California. The
plaintiffs are asking the court to require the Forest Service to
immediately stop the fee program. A big issue here is that low-income
persons and minorities are financially discriminated against. Fees are
exclusionary and discriminatory.
I was
fortunate recently to be included on a private Middle Fork rafting trip.
$5/person/day is the price of admission. In 2001, our party of 10 on a
seven-day float coughed up $350 in cash at the put-in. No cash—no
float! The Salmon-Challis NF is generating half a million dollars per
year in river fees. Quite a cash cow! My question is: Whose Wild and
Scenic River is it anyway? Didn’t it originally belong to us, the
citizens?
It is my
contention that it costs the Sawtooth NF at least 50 cents in
bureaucratic overhead for every dollar collected. Nationally, fee-demo
monies were allegedly siphoned off for forest fire fighting this summer,
with promise of repayment. Forest Service accounting methods are
archaic. The ill-will that fees generate among forest users must end. No
business, public or private, can afford such highly negative customer
relationships and expect to be successful! The small amount collected in
fees is not worth one hundredth of the damage to customer relations.
Fee demo
has the potential to get exponentially worse.
It is
heavily lobbied in Congress by powerful recreational product and resort
industry companies. If fee-demo were to be permanently authorized, it
would permit federal land managers to forge unholy
"partnerships" with private corporations in the development of
commercial recreation ventures on public lands on a giant scale. Fee
demo is the thin edge of the wedge. The butt end of the wedge will be
horrific.
It is
clearly the moral imperative of Congress to adequately fund recreation
and wilderness programs. We have spent $80 billion on fighting terror
and national security since Sept. 11. It’s time to spend just a few
billion on the public lands.
Contact
Sawtooth Forest Supervisor Ruth Monahan at 737-3200, and ask that she
respond to majority opinion and work proactively to get fees eliminated.
Contact your Congressman. Make your voice heard. Axing fees will be a
win-win for all concerned. Recreation users can then reclaim their
absolute right to take a hike in their woods unregulated and unfettered.
Personal freedom is what the public lands are all about. We must keep it
that way.
Scott
Phillips, of Hailey, is a retired U.S. Forest Service employee.