Don’t sacrifice
character for traffic remedies
Call it
what you will—good news-bad news, win-lose, downside with the upside,
bitter-sweet.
The
unavoidable fact is this—growth (the good news that provides
prosperity) also multiplies vehicles on Ketchum streets (the bad news
that creates mounting traffic problems).
The basic
problem is that Ketchum is not an island unto itself. The town’s
traffic woes stem from north-south through-traffic on Highway 75, as
well as residents throughout the Wood River Valley drawn to Ketchum for
jobs, shopping and recreational and social events that make the town a
magnet.
Ketchum
is no more immune from traffic congestion than Los Angeles.
But the
array of proposed solutions presented this month to the city of Ketchum
by the traffic consultant Earth Tech, of Bellevue, Wash., shouldn’t be
considered the last word in long-range remedies.
One of
the report’s most atrocious suggestions is a by-pass road around
Ketchum’s Main Street and down one of West Ketchum’s streets. The
report’s recognition of disadvantages to this scheme is an
understatement—"impacts on abutting residents, school businesses
depending on selected alignment; high construction cost for some
alignment choices."
Indeed. A
by-pass would virtually destroy the lifestyle in West Ketchum.
One of
the least odious proposals is to ban parking on one or both sides of
Main Street, thus opening the equivalent of another lane. But even this
would allow cars to dominate downtown at the expense of both businesses
and pedestrians.
Several
other alternatives have been given less attention by the consultants—paid
off-street parking and more intense intra- and inter-city transit to
reduce usage of cars.
Some
vehicles are unavoidably needed throughout the day because of the nature
of their owners’ jobs. But others—commuters, shoppers, strolling
sightseers—could accommodate their transportation needs without adding
to the town’s traffic congestion.
For
example, park-and-ride lots on the fringes of Ketchum could be developed
for parking and from where frequent transit service to the downtown area
would be provided. Ketchum’s KART could expand to include jitney
service—rapid, small-vehicle service in main corridors of the city.
If
parking were banned on major streets, then the city would necessarily
need centralized parking facilities in strategic locations, some
charging fees for the convenience of closer proximity.
The
geography surrounding Ketchum unfortunately prohibits any reasonable
ways for constructing a by-pass loop to move through-traffic on Highway
75 traffic around the city.
Having
said that, it’s also imperative that solutions to accommodate
increased traffic not ignore or destroy the character of the city’s
business district and residential neighborhoods.
Other
communities, large and small, that’ve bowed to the automobile at the
expense of their character have become unattractive after thoughts to
their traffic solutions.