Citizens plead
for advisory ballot
Council stands
firm on tabling issue
By GREG
STAHL
Express Staff Writer
A half
dozen Ketchum citizens pleaded to no avail Monday for the Ketchum City
Council to reconsider its decision two weeks earlier to put off an
advisory election that would clarify the public’s wishes on how the
city should conduct city council elections.
Citizens
reminded the city council that it made a unanimous decision Feb. 19 to
seek citizen advice on the city’s long-standing election controversy,
which pits an at-large voting system against a per-seat system.
But the
council unanimously voted two weeks ago to put off an advisory election
pending research and public education efforts on a variety of election
procedures. The decision, and reportedly inflammatory exchanges between
council members and the mayor, got citizens’ attention.
"You
said you’d do it," Ketchum resident Anne Corrock said. "You’ve
said it since February."
Only
Councilman Maurice Charlat appeared willing to reverse his vote of two
weeks earlier.
"I
do believe we literally promised to do this," he said. "I see
no reason for us to hold up."
However,
the city only has until Sept. 20 to decide on language for the advisory
ballot and submit it to the county to ask the question this November.
Additionally, the Feb. 19 vote did not specify a date during which an
advisory election should be held, according to the meeting’s minutes.
The
majority of council members said there is too little time to hold the
advisory vote this fall.
"Two
weeks ago, it was too soon to do it, and now we’re being asked to do
it in three days," Council President Randy Hall said.
While
Hall said the city would risk conducting the election without proper
public education if it pushes for a November question, Charlat contended
that the coming month is plenty of time.
"There
isn’t a lot of work to do," Charlat said. "There has already
been a tremendous amount of discussion."
The
election debate surfaced in the winter of 2001 when the city council
unanimously voted, with Charlat absent, to change the city’s voting
procedures to a per-seat system from an at-large system. Charlat and a
handful of citizens have since championed a return to the at-large
system or an advisory vote indicating which method Ketchum citizens
prefer.
Except
for the Feb. 19 vote, the majority of the council has not swayed.
Grounding
arguments in the unfairness of so-called bullet voting, where voters
intentionally cast one rather than two votes in an at-large format, the
city’s leaders, with Charlat and Mayor Ed Simon as exceptions,
maintained that the new, per-seats system is most fair.
Since the
debate’s beginning, references have been made to the city’s 1999
election, in which Charlat and Hall both easily won in an at-large
format against incumbent Councilwoman Sue Noel.
In that
election, according to a ballot count performed by the Mountain Express,
747 residents voted and were permitted two votes each. Charlat obtained
98 single votes; Hall received 48 and Noel received 27. (The city’s
total tally included an additional ballot).
It is
impossible to determine how many of the candidates’ single votes were
cast intentionally (making them bullets), but Hall argues that the
difference between candidates indicates some level of organization.
"We
now know exactly how many bullet votes we have and who is the recipient
of those bullet votes," Hall said. "That is information we did
not have in February.
"Do
559 people want their votes to count as much as the 173 people who
bullet voted? The answer has got to be a resounding: ‘Hell yes.’ It’s
just got to be."
Despite
Hall’s contention, Charlat, the leading recipient of single votes in
1999, said he "absolutely" was not aware of any organized
bullet voting campaign on his behalf, if one occurred at all.
The
numbers debate notwithstanding, Ketchum City Administrator Ron LeBlanc
said advisory ballots are generally not used to help craft public
policy.
In 24
years as a city and town manager in municipalities around the country,
he said he encountered only one advisory ballot. Grotton, Conn., where
he was most recently employed before Ketchum, had a legal opinion
preventing advisory ballots, he said.
Citizens
were clearly agitated Monday night at the council’s refusal to push
for a November advisory vote.
"This
is just a simple thing. Up or down? Designated seat or open seat?"
Sun Valley citizen Milt Adam said.
Ketchum
citizen Rod Sievers encouraged the council to at least set a date for a
referendum election.
"If
you don’t set a date in concrete, it won’t get done," he said.
"Let’s get it done."