$65,000 settles
Ketchum police dispute
McNeil named
assistant police chief
"We
didn’t want the controversy. We want to run this city efficiently. We
thought, ‘Let’s clear it up as quickly as we can.’"
—
BAIRD GOURLAY, Ketchum
city councilman
By GREG
STAHL
Express Staff Writer
The
Ketchum City Council cleaned up a summer-long personnel mess last week
in three tidy decisions, including one that costs the city and its
insurance company $65,000.
The
decisions were a loss for Mayor Ed Simon, whose assistant police chief
appointment, Ron Taylor, went back to work at the Blaine County Sheriff’s
Office in mid-August. Last week, Taylor also walked away with a $65,000
settlement from the city.
McNeil
The
decisions were a win for Ketchum Police Chief Cal Nevland and former
Police Lt. Mike McNeil, who’s the city’s new assistant police chief.
Neveland and McNeil had filed a lawsuit against the city and its mayor
when Nevland’s decision to promote McNeil to assistant chief was
usurped by the mayor’s decision to hire Taylor early in June.
Following
a brief executive session Aug. 29—at least the eighth executive
session officials held on the topic—the city council unanimously
authorized the city’s participation in two settlements, one with
Nevland and McNeil and the second with Taylor.
Councilwoman
Chris Potters was absent from the meeting, and Councilman Baird Gourlay
abstained from a third, confidential decision pertaining to McNeil’s
personnel records and a grievance he filed with the city.
The
settlement with McNeil and Nevland assures McNeil’s promotion to the
position of assistant police chief, a $54,000-per-year post. It also
assures that Nevland and McNeil will withdraw a lawsuit they filed
against the city and its mayor in 5th District Court in
Hailey. The lawsuit sought clarification over who has hire-and-fire
authority over the assistant police chief position.
The
$65,000 Taylor procured in damages was for "pain and suffering and
mental anguish," according to the signed agreement. The city is
splitting the cost of the settlement with its insurance company, Idaho
Counties Risk Management Program.
The
settlement is in addition to $1,464.96 that Taylor grossed while on the
city’s payroll for seven days in early August, a period during which
he did not work because of a court order preventing his active
employment until the lawsuit was resolved.
In the
settlement, the city also agreed to pay Taylor’s legal expenses.
The
seemingly large settlement figure represents the difference between
Taylor’s Sheriff’s Office salary and his Ketchum Police Department
salary over six years—the time he had committed to working for the
city during interviews—and an allowance for being inconvenienced,
Taylor’s attorney, Brian Elkins, said.
Two out
of four city council members and the mayor corroborated Elkins’
explanation.
"I
felt like we put Ron (Taylor) in a bad situation," Councilman Baird
Gourlay said. "You hire a guy, and two weeks after he’s supposed
to show up for duty, you ask him to leave. So he suffers.
"You
also look at what it could do for his future. You have to look at the
difference in the wages he was going to make in that period of
time."
Gourlay
said the council’s willingness to fight the lawsuit and grievance
appeared to waffle following a grievance hearing Aug. 5. Gourlay did not
attend that meeting but said he was later brought up to speed.
"My
belief is that, after the grievance hearing, it became apparent that the
city attorney and the city council, they felt the mayor’s case wasn’t
as strong, because of ambiguities in the handbook," Gourlay said.
In a
contest seeking who had authority to hire an assistant police chief, it
may not have helped Simon’s case when, at the grievance hearing,
attorneys produced an employee evaluation of Nevland, signed by Simon,
that said the police chief did a "good" job hiring and
managing personnel. The evaluation also said Nevland exceeds
expectations marks for staff supervision and hiring.
"You
continue to use your existing staff wisely…You have done a good job in
recruiting new people," read the evaluation.
In the
review, signed in March and released to the Mountain Express by Nevland
this week, the chief also wrote that one of his short-term goals was to
"promote from within to fill Asst. Police Chief position."
"It
had impact," Council President Randy Hall said, answering a
question about the evaluation’s effect. "When Cal’s evaluation
surfaced during McNeil’s grievance hearing, the council unanimously
went from a litigation posture to a mitigation posture. Cal’s
evaluation had two exceeds expectations and clearly states Cal’s
intention to hire an assistant police chief from within his
department."
But
despite the struggle to determine who had authority to hire an assistant
police chief, Simon, like Nevland, maintained that his man was right for
the job.
"I
think Ron Taylor is a man of the highest character and integrity, and I
find no fault with any of his actions," Simon said. "Ron
Taylor would have taken the Ketchum Police Department in a new
direction, which is sorely needed."
Simon
said that the Ketchum Police Department has many high quality employees
but needs "new leadership, new attitudes and new direction."
"I’m
not happy with the image it’s presenting. I want more and better
public relations and more involvement with the community," he said.
But the
fight was beginning to become drawn out, and the city council eventually
stepped in to clean up the city’s image.
"We
didn’t want the controversy. We want to run this city
efficiently," Gourlay said. "We thought, ‘Let’s clear it
up as quickly as we can.’"
To help
clean up the mess and prevent future disputes along the same vein, the
city council said it will revise the city’s personnel handbook;
develop new hiring, performance and promotion standards; and explore the
possibility for accreditation of Ketchum Police Department by the
Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies.
"What
we’ve got is an employee handbook that was authored in 1992. Here we
are almost 10 years later with an outdated document," Councilman
Maurice Charlat said. "It doesn’t envision some of the problems
we may face and some of the problems we just did face.
"Out
of this will be a review of hiring and performance standards in the
police department. From that perspective, it will be beneficial for
everybody."
The
assistant police chief debate bore similarities to a 1992 dispute that
resulted in then-councilman Simon and two other council members being
recalled after trying to fire Nevland.
While
Nevland contended that Simon’s decisions this summer stemmed from the
1992 controversy, Simon maintained that his decisions had "nothing
to do with ’92."
For his
part, Nevland said his actions were fueled only by a motivation to
retire from a top-notch, well-managed police department.
"I
am retiring in the very near future, and I want to leave this police
department in good shape," said the 22-year chief. "This was
not a power play on my part. It was entirely doing what I felt very
strongly about what is in the best interests of the department and the
community.
"This
way, I have done what I can do."