Taking the tax to
task
Should Ketchum
hike its
sales tax by 1 percent?
By GREG
STAHL
Express Staff Writer
Ketchum
and Sun Valley are among a select few cities in Idaho allowed to enact a
levy to offset the financial burdens tourism imposes on local
infrastructures.
The idea
behind the tax is that tourists should help pay for services they
require—such as additional sewer and water capacities and more police
and fire protection.
Resort
business is the bread and butter of Ketchum’s economy. Ketchum
Mayor Ed Simon has proposed boosting a local sales tax by 1 percent, but
retailers are wondering how a hike would affect business. Express
photo by David N. Seelig
In
Ketchum, politicians have identified a need for land, which, they say,
could be used in any number of ways to help the resort economy.
Affordable housing for area employees, parks for residents and visitors’
relaxation and parking are examples.
Last
spring, Ketchum Mayor Ed Simon proposed that city officials and citizens
consider boosting the local option tax (LOT) by 1 percent to help fund
land acquisition, but, in the current economic environment, the idea is
getting mixed reviews.
"Certainly
I can say that, overall, the local option tax in Ketchum and Sun Valley
has been a significant source of income to help keep mill rate levies
low for local property owners and to provide a lot of additional
services," said Carol Waller, executive director of the Sun
Valley-Ketchum Chamber and Visitors Bureau. "But you want to be
sensitive about making it a competitive disadvantage for Ketchum
businesses, because it’s already a challenge."
•
The LOT
is a voter-enabled levy on short-term rentals, liquor by the drink and
general sales. It raised $1.9 million in Ketchum’s 2000-2001 fiscal
year.
State law
allows only resort cities to apply this additional tax and caps it at 3
percent. Changes to the tax must be approved by a majority of voters.
Ketchum
currently institutes a 1 percent tax on retail sales and a 2 percent tax
on rooms and liquor. Voters last approved the LOT in November 1997 by an
87 percent margin. The levy is scheduled to expire in 2013.
The
concept of raising the tax isn’t new, either. The neighboring resort
city of Sun Valley raised its local option tax from 2 to 3 percent in
1999.
In the
early winter of 1998, a group of Sun Valley business owners, including
Sun Valley Co., banded together to fight the 1 percent sales tax hike
Sun Valley’s citizens had approved by a narrow margin in that year’s
November election. The tax, they said, would drive away tourists.
Despite
the business owners’ objections, the tax went into effect as scheduled
early in 1999. It is difficult to tell, however, if business was
ultimately lost.
"Can
I attribute a loss of business? I don’t know," said Bill Mason,
who owns Bill Mason Outfitters in Sun Valley. "I can tell you that
it certainly hasn’t helped."
Mason
contended that the tax in Sun Valley is helping pay for services, like
road building and bike path expansion, the city should pay for using
property taxes. He also suggested that Ketchum tread lightly.
"I
would be very careful about it in Ketchum," he said. "What
local business that’s left in Ketchum just keeps getting shoved
southward."
•
According
to a 2001 economic analysis of Blaine County, the majority of the LOT is
generated by tourism.
"Visitors
generate approximately 80 percent of the total local option tax receipts
(in Sun Valley and Ketchum combined)" states the study, compiled
for the CVB.
In
Ketchum, visitors generate closer to 70 percent of the total revenues.
For that
reason, the LOT is widely regarded as a good deal for local residents.
The difficult part is striking a balance whereby prospective customers
aren’t deterred and the local cities gain the greatest benefit
possible.
In
Ketchum, lodge, hotel and condominium owners collect a total of 9
percent in taxes on a room once the state’s 5 percent sales tax and 2
percent room taxes are added, too. In Sun Valley, they collect 10
percent. Among a sample of seven resort cities, only Park City, Utah,
lodging owners collect a higher tax, at 10.35 percent.
"Once
you’re getting into double digits, especially if you’re talking
about the group market, you’re starting to get into a competitive
disadvantage," Waller cautioned.
Ketchum
retailers collect a 6 percent levy. Among the seven resort cities,
Ketchum is the lowest. Aspen, Colo., is highest, at 8.6 percent.
Waller
said the CVB has not started to gauge its members’ opinions on the
additional 1 percent proposed in Ketchum. Speculating on the issue would
be difficult, she added.
From
interviews with a smattering of area business owners, it appears the
proposal is getting mixed reviews.
Lodge
owners, thus far, have landed more frequently on the con side of the
fence.
"It
may help Ketchum, but it helps strangle the retail and lodging
communities that fuel the engine that drives the economy in
Ketchum," said Tamarack Lodge owner Ken Carwin. "In times like
this, when it’s tough for everybody, we ought to look at decreasing
spending rather than increasing taxes."
Carwin
pointed out that he has already lowered his prices to offset the slow
economy. He said he would rather go back to charging regular rates than
collect another 1 percent for the city.
At a
public hearing in Ketchum last week, Allen Pennay, owner of Pennay’s
at River Run, another lodging property, said this is no time to be
talking about raising taxes. Tourism is on the decline, he said, and the
city should not do anything that could encourage further decline.
Three
local retailers who were interviewed last week, on the other hand,
disagreed.
Bob
Gordon, who owns Formula Sports, said he would support a 1 percent
increase for land acquisition if the ultimate use were specific.
Employee housing would be specific enough, he said.
"We
have an incredible need for employee housing, and whatever we can do to
institute that, the city and the county need to do it," he said.
Brian
Kriesien, owner of KB’s, said that, while another 1 percent sounds
like a lot, he may support an increase if land acquisition were focused
on open space or affordable housing.
"More
and more people are moving south," he said. "Housing just
keeps getting pushed under the rug."
•
When Sun
Valley boosted its tax by 1 percent in 1999, the outcry from area
business owners was enough to draw the attention of local state
legislators, Clint Stennett and Wendy Jaquet, both Ketchum Democrats.
The tax
is a "special privilege" given by the Legislature, Stennett
said. I don’t want to overdo it, to where we lose local support. That
would be my concern about doubling the rate in Ketchum."
Stennett
pointed out that Idaho’s conservative Legislature rarely grants local
control of taxes.
"It’s
always tenuous," he said, "and we want to make sure we don’t
have issues and problems at home, so we can keep it going."