ITD weighs Hwy.
75 upgrade options
Says four lanes
needed
through much of valley
"We’re
looking at a continuous three-lane option, but that is probably not
going to perform very well in terms of accommodating traffic."
— DIANA
ATKINS, Parsons
Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas highway consultant
By GREGORY
FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
A
consultant for the Idaho Transportation Department said last week that
the state is continuing to weigh alternatives for expanding Highway 75
through the Wood River Valley, but has tentatively determined that four
lanes are needed to accommodate traffic along most stretches of the
route.
Diana
Atkins, a representative of the Utah-based consulting firm Parsons
Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, conducted an eight-hour "Drop-in
Storefront Office" in Bellevue City Hall Aug. 20 to answer
questions from the public about ongoing state studies of ways to
accommodate projected increases in traffic on the highway through the
next 20 years.
The
public forum was one of a series of monthly gatherings throughout the
valley this summer. The next meeting is slated for Tuesday, Sept. 17, at
the Wood River Inn in Hailey.
The
meetings are being held as Parsons Brinckerhoff, ITD and the Federal
Highway Administration attempt to determine what the best course of
action—if any—is necessary to improve traffic flow on the
increasingly congested 27-mile stretch of highway from Timmerman
Junction at U.S. 20 to Saddle Road, just north of Ketchum.
"Federal
Highways makes the ultimate decision, but is influenced by public
comment," Atkins said.
The state
and its consultant are currently in the third phase of an anticipated
nine-phase plan that likely will not include any construction work until
sometime during or after 2004.
Researchers
for the state have predicted that traffic growth will increase in the
valley some 60 to 80 percent over the next 20 years, at a pace of 2.5 to
3 percent each year.
Project
managers through September plan to identify what alternatives should be
considered, through a combination of scientific research and public
input.
Starting
in the fall, they intend to start evaluating the environmental, traffic,
aesthetic and other impacts of the various alternatives. The results,
along with a specified "preferred alternative," will
subsequently be incorporated into a draft Environmental Impact
Statement.
Last week’s
forum in Bellevue was sparsely attended, with a dozen-or-so valley
residents showing up during the day to review aerial maps of the highway
corridor that showed the existing highway in relation to the state’s
right-of-way along the 27 miles.
Despite
the low turnout, Atkins said she believes public input has played a key
role in helping the state determine which alternatives will be reviewed
in the DEIS set to be released next spring.
She said
the state is currently looking at a variety of expansion options geared
for specific sections of the route. The options include:
·
Widening the highway to accommodate four traffic lanes, two northbound
and two southbound.
·
Widening the highway in places from two lanes to three lanes, with one
in each direction for continuous traffic and a single lane for turning
cars.
·
Expanding the highway in select places to five lanes, with two in each
direction and an additional turn lane.
· Not
widening the highway at all, an alternative that the state is required
by law to consider.
Atkins
said that although no preferred alternative has been developed, the
state through its research and analysis over the last two years has
determined that a need exists for a continuous four-lane highway through
much of the valley.
"We’re
looking at a continuous three-lane option, but that is probably not
going to perform very well in terms of accommodating traffic," she
said.
Atkins
noted that projected increases in traffic would best be served by a
highway consisting of "two lanes in each direction with some center
turn lanes" through much of the corridor.
However,
Atkins said the state and the FHA will be forced to consider a variety
of factors other than providing optimal traffic flow.
"They
try to meet the transportation need and the community’s need, but
sometimes they are in conflict," Atkins said.
Key
elements of the state’s existing studies and plans indicate that ITD
and its consultants:
· Favor
a three-lane road through Reinheimer Ranch and southern Ketchum below
the Trail Creek Bridge, but have been asked by some residents to look at
a four-lane option. Atkins said the state will consider putting in four
traffic lanes south of the bridge, but is not considering work north of
that point.
· Have
determined a need for four traffic lanes through much of the mid-valley,
but need to conduct additional studies on how to maintain access to all
side roads.
·
Propose to make no significant alterations to the highway through
downtown Hailey or Bellevue.
· Have
determined a need for four lanes from Bellevue north to Fox Acres Road
in southern Hailey, as well as center turn lanes and traffic lights at
Countryside and Woodside boulevards.
·
Believe that only two continuous traffic lanes are needed south of
Gannett Road in Bellevue, yet will consider options for expansion,
including a four-lane configuration.
Complicating
the decisions will be landowners not wanting to allow an expansion
project to encroach on their real estate, and federal regulations that
require noise-mitigation measures be implemented if traffic along the
highway creates too much noise in surrounding residential areas.
Atkins
said if noise limits are exceeded, the state would be required to
install "some sort of barrier" to reduce the impacts. She
noted that because the county limits the height of earthen berms, the
state would alternatively be forced to consider installing a wall.
"However,
that goes against what are most people’s values of scenic
qualities," she said.
As for
the results of sound studies on the highway, Atkins said she is
"sure there will be areas that go over federal standards."
Atkins
suggested that state researchers overall believe a widened road will
handle traffic more efficiently, but acknowledged that congestion on
Highway 75 would likely not be eliminated altogether, particularly south
of Ketchum.
"It’s
probably a true statement that traffic will bottleneck in that
area," she said.