P&Z denies
Elkhorn demolition project
Developers told
to submit
entire plan for village
"Until
we see a master plan, this isn’t going to fly."
KEN
HERICH, Sun
Valley Planning and Zoning
commissioner
By GREGORY
FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
In a
far-ranging decision that temporarily halts all demolition and
reconstruction plans for Elkhorn Village, members of the Sun Valley
Planning and Zoning Commission Tuesday unanimously denied an application
by the owners of Elkhorn Resort to raze a section of buildings on the
north side of village core.
Landscape
architect Kurt Eggers explains aspects of his plan to landscape a
new parking lot proposed by CG Elkhorn for the north side of Elkhorn
Village. Looking on, from right to left, are architect Woody Bryant and
Sun Valley P&Z commissioners Ken Herich, Mark Pynn and Jim
McLaughlin. Commissioners Nils Ribi, behind Herich, Phil Usher and Blair
Boand, behind Eggers, are obscured. Express photo by David N. Seelig
In
rendering the 6-0 vote against the proposed project, the panel issued a
mandate to developers CG Elkhorn to submit to the city for approval a
detailed master plan of their intended large-scale redevelopment of the
village.
"Until
we see a master plan, this isn’t going to fly," Commissioner Ken
Herich said.
All six
members of the panel were unified in determining that they did not want
to approve aspects of the redevelopment in a piecemeal fashion, but
would consider changes to the village as part of a complete demolition
and reconstruction application.
Applicant
Woody Bryant, a Sun Valley architect representing resort owners CG
Elkhorn, had earlier this month asked the city for approval to demolish
the River Rock Steak House, Treat Haus and Elkhorn post office buildings
to make space for a new parking lot.
The
proposed demolition was identified as the first element of a larger
five-phase demolition plan to raze the Elkhorn Hotel, golf shop, tennis
courts, swimming pool and an assortment of existing business spaces.
The
initial plan to demolish the commercial structures for installation of a
new parking lot was required to have the P&Z’s formal Design
Review approval because the buildings are attached to two residential
buildings that are part of the Elkhorn Village Condominiums.
CG
Elkhorn in April showed plans to the P&Z which outlined its
intention to tear down the 132-room hotel and parts of the village to
install 56 fractional-ownership condominiums, 38 townhouses and an
amenities building with an adjacent recreational complex.
Part of
the deal hinges on a proposed land swap with the Sun Valley Elkhorn
Association, which is tentatively scheduled to be voted on by homeowners
next month.
However,
the developers have never filed an official application to seek approval
of the plan.
With no
approved master plan, the applicants Tuesday sought permission to begin
the first phase of the demolition work on Sept. 15.
After
reviewing the parking lot proposal, commissioners asked project
representative Ned Williamson why CG Elkhorn wanted to separate the
parking lot project from the larger plan.
"We’re
in negotiations to have an agreement with (residents of) the Elkhorn
Village Condominiums to have them park in the new lot instead of at the
hotel," Williamson said.
Commissioners
Nils Ribi and Blair Boand both expressed concern about whether the
parking lot was indeed part of the proposed—but not approved—master
plan.
Architect
Bryant told the panel that the parking lot proposal would
"facilitate" the rest of the project. "This is a large
complicated project," he said. "We’re just trying to
eliminate obstacles along the way."
Of
approximately 40 area residents in attendance, several spoke out against
the proposed demolition.
Ketchum
attorney Barry Luboviski said he thought the proposal went against
language in Sun Valley’s Comprehensive Plan that dictated the city
should have a second commercial center outside of the main village.
"Without the master plan, you can’t develop this (Commercial
Center) District," he said.
Resident
Judy Gilmartin agreed. "I know that none of us want a hole in the
ground for the next 10 years," she said. "Let’s get our
ducks in line before we start something."
Elkhorn
Village business owner Todd Van Bramer expressed concern for the fate of
Elkhorn businesses that have long-term leases. "It sounds like a
real open-ended proposition to me," he said.
Following
the public’s comments, Commissioners Boand and Phil Usher were the
first to express concern about the need for an approved master plan.
In the
end, the panel agreed to request that CG Elkhorn submit a master plan
application, complete demolition plan and construction schedule before
it asks for permission to tear down buildings in the village.
Also key
to the discussions Tuesday were comments made by City Attorney Rand
Peebles suggesting that CG Elkhorn would not be able to obtain approval
for other phases of the demolition without first getting permission from
the P&Z.
City
officials had previously determined that some of the demolition might be
approved administratively by the city building inspector, but Peebles
Tuesday said that all of the larger demolition project "would
likely come under Design Review purview" of the P&Z.
Despite
the unanimous vote denying the demolition, some commissioners did show
some conceptual support for the CG Elkhorn plan.
Ribi
suggested that changes were warranted, but not incrementally. "This
is basically a Band-Aid being put on something that needs a
tourniquet," he said.
Herich
was more succinct. "I would like to see this thing torn down,"
he said of the troubled resort.