BLM sets meetings
on land classification
Public input
sought
The
Bureau of Land Management’s Shoshone Field Office will host an open
house meeting at the Old County Courthouse in Hailey on July 24 from 4
p.m. to 8 p.m. on its Environmental Assessment related to Area of
Critical Environmental Concern designations and land tenure adjustment.
Another
meeting will be held July 23 from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the Shoshone Field
Office Fire Conference Room in Shoshone.
The
60-day comment period commenced June 28 and will conclude August 28.
Environmental documents are available on the Internet at www.id.blm.gov/planning/shoshone_lupa/index.htm.
Questions
should be directed to Field Manager Bill Baker at 208-732-7286.
By GREG
STAHL
Express Staff Writer
As part
of an effort to reclassify federal land holdings in the region, the
Bureau of Land Management has proposed to label its Wood River Valley
holdings with a unique classification.
The
classification is part of what the BLM’s Shoshone Field Office calls
land tenure adjustment. For the past two years, the BLM has collected
public comments and worked to compile a document that gives a broad
overview of land-use planning issues in the 1.44-million-acre Shoshone
Field Office district and a small part of the contiguous Four Rivers
Field Office district to the west.
The
document very generally specifies areas where the BLM should consolidate
its ownership and areas where dispersed holdings should be traded or
sold. It also proposes nearly a dozen Areas of Critical Environmental
Concern, where "special management attention is required" to
protect historic, cultural, scenic, fish, wildlife and other natural
values.
One of
the proposed ACECs was requested by the city of Ketchum and is located
near the confluence of Warm Springs Creek and the Big Wood River. The
BLM does not recommend the Big Wood-Warm Springs ACEC in its preferred
alternative, but the area will be kept in federal ownership.
"This
is a planning document, a broad brush document designed to cover the
entire Shoshone Field Office," said Shoshone Office Recreation
Specialist Rick VanderVoet. "The Wood River Valley is being set out
as its own zone. It’s got a lot of unique issues."
Three
alternatives to existing management are provided in the Shoshone Land
Use Plans Draft Amendments and Environmental Assessment. A preferred
alternative proposes designating local BLM lands as an "Area of
Influence of the Wood River Valley," otherwise called Zone 5, and
includes lands that are within the "viewshed" of Bellevue,
Hailey, Ketchum and Sun Valley.
"This
zone was created based on public comments and concerns communicated
during the scoping period," according to the document.
The other
zones, numbered one through four, are labeled on a decreasing scale of
the importance of land retention. Zone 1 lands are ACECs, Wilderness
Study Areas, National Monuments or other areas that must stay in federal
ownership. Zone 2 lands are well consolidated and contain potentially
high resource values. Zones 1 and 2 are considered "retention
areas."
Zone 3
lands are small to medium sized blocks of land that are interspersed
with private or state holdings. Zone 4 lands are isolated, difficult to
manage parcels. Zones 3, 4 and 5 are "adjustment areas."
The land
ownership characteristics of the Wood River Valley are very similar to
Zone 3, according to the draft document.
"Zone
5 is a small land area, with only 121,000 acres of public lands. More
acres within the zone are in private ownership than public ownership.
State lands account for 20,000 acres or 7 percent of the zone."
According
to a description of the Wood River Valley, the emphasis will be to
consolidate ownership, using a no-net-loss trading policy within the
zone. Management will also "maximize public values, provide public
access and improve efficiencies in public lands management."
"The
BLM’s goal for this zone is to maintain the public land acreage by
exchanging public land in other zones for private land in Zone 5,"
according to the document.
Additionally,
the BLM would prefer to dispose of lands when necessary via patent to
local or state government entities. VanderVoet said there are a myriad
of reasons local governments might be interested in acquiring some of
the BLM’s holdings, including affordable housing, open space and
infrastructure needs, to name a few.