Hailey faces
lawsuit over Roundup denial
By PAT
MURPHY
Express Staff Writer
The city of
Hailey is headed to court again to defend its latest decision rejecting
for the second time the plans of Roundup Corral for development of a light
industrial park in the Woodside area adjoining the city’s sewer
treatment plant.
Boise
attorney Gary Allen, who represents Roundup’s owner, Judy Hartley
Castle, who goes by the name Castle, announced his intention to resume
litigation against the city following Thursday’s special city council
session.
Allen’s
plea that a light industrial development would be an economic benefit to
the city apparently didn’t sway the council.
The vote to
deny the Roundup application for a planned unit development was 4-0, with
Councilman Richard Davis recusing himself because of a potential conflict.
Davis is employed by a property title company.
A Woodside
resident, Chris Matey, told the council that when he bought his home 19
years ago, the builder assured him that the nearby open space would never
be rezoned for light industry.
Castle also
rose to speak in behalf of her project. To fears that children in nearby
neighborhoods would be jeopardized by the presence of a light industrial
park and truck traffic, she argued that children don’t play in
industrial areas. She also said parents should be responsible for the
whereabouts of their children.
The city
originally gave tentative approval to the project in 1999, but after a
storm of complaints from residential homeowners near the proposed
development about the land being dedicated to open space, Hailey reversed
itself.
In Thursday’s
action, the council voted to deny the proposal after City Planning
Director Kathy Grotto made a lengthy statement in which she point-by-point
ticked off aspects of the plan that were not in conformity with code or
had met with safety objections from the city fire department.
Among the
nonconforming details Grotto cited is the planned roadway serving the
proposed industrial area — 24 feet wide, although the code requires 44
feet curb-to-curb.
But the
main legal issue that divides the city and Roundup’s owner is whether
the 87 acres was dedicated as open space and therefore incompatible as an
industrial area.
Two years
ago on Nov. 30, 2000, U.S. Magistrate Mikel Williams ruled in the city’s
favor, declaring "there has been a common law dedication of the
property as open space" on early city plats.
It was that
decision that Roundup’s owner had planned to appeal, but then postponed
to try once again for rezoning of the property.
The case
now will be heard in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit,
probably in August.