Gun-toting
candidate asks special treatment
Commentary
by PAT MURPHY
Whew! How
relieved voters in Idaho’s First Congressional District must be, knowing
that Steve Gothard’s demand as a condition of him serving in Congress
has been rejected by police in Washington, D.C.
For those
who missed the story:
Gothard is
the presumptive Libertarian candidate running against incumbent
Congressman Butch Otter, a Republican.
But even
before the November election, Gothard has laid down this demand: if
elected, he won’t go to Washington unless the local government makes an
exception to gun laws and allows him to run around town with a 9-mm
submachine gun and a "backup" pistol tucked under his coat.
Well,
wouldn’t you know it. Those hardheaded cops in Washington informed him
they’d make no exceptions, not even for Gothard, a man who apparently
considers himself worthy of special treatment.
So, now
that he knows he wouldn’t be allowed to carry his beloved guns around
the streets of Washington, Gothard’s run for Congress becomes pointless,
except for attention he’s created for himself.
However,
there is another government job that would allow Gothard to carry guns all
day: he could enlist in the Army, ask for assignment upfront in
Afghanistan where he’d be surrounded with guns and the constant sounds
of gun fire and maybe even have a chance to shoot and kill someone.
Gothard
would consider that paradise.
•
American
families who willingly shared shortages and sacrifices of World War II
enrolled in a range of wartime programs to stretch scarce resources—scrap
collection programs, rationing, backyard Victory gardens.
And there
also were "meatless" days, when families gave up meat to make
sure troops overseas had plenty.
Is that
spirit of sacrifice alive today at a time when states and the nation are
facing financial tough times?
It probably
is too much to expect the president and the Congress to stop ladling out
billions of dollars in unnecessary favors to special interest groups, as
the $190 billion farm subsidies bill illustrates.
But what if
all state and federal employees, who have the nation’s most secure jobs
were suddenly gripped with a compulsion for extraordinary service to their
country, were to forgo salaries on "payless" days to get their
governments over the hump?
Consider
just the impact of a "payless" day on the federal budget.
The
National Taxpayers Union, which tracks Washington’s spending habits,
says there are 2.7 million federal employees. Their average salary, NTU
says, is $46,728.
So, if all
2.7 million were to forgo a single day’s pay ($180 average), the saving
would be $486 million.
Not much by
Washington standards.
But the
gesture in itself might set a tone that could shame the Big Wasters into
joining in sacrifice for a change.