Aiming at
the wrong target
Commentary
by PAT MURPHY
This may
fall under the heading of a "so what!" dustup for most Idaho
voters: does Democrat Jerry Brady have a conflict of interest by not
resigning his job as publisher of the Post Register newspaper in Idaho
Falls while running for governor?
The Idaho
Statesman’s editorial page believes so, although its reasoning seems
far-fetched and illogical.
By only
taking a leave of absence rather than resigning, Brady (so the Statesman
argues) somehow has stealth control over the newspaper’s reporting and
editorials that will grease the way into the governor’s office.
That’s a
real stretch.
However,
what should trouble the Statesman editors, if they want to wade into these
murky waters, are the real rather than illusory conflicts of state
legislators of both parties who routinely vote on bills that directly
affect their private occupations and businesses.
Just leaf
through profiles of legislators in the Idaho Blue Book, a compendium of
everything you need and don’t need to know about the state, and tote up
the number of farmers, ranchers, insurance agents, lawyers and others
whose businesses are touched by bills they routinely sponsor and/or vote
on.
But so long
as our political system of elective office is the backbone of government,
there’s no alternative that comes to mind. The public is at the mercy of
the honesty of lawmakers ¾ either to abstain from voting on laws that
benefit their businesses or announce the benefits of a law before they
vote.
Moreover,
the public trust can really be protected by daily newspapers such as the
Statesman if their reporters rigorously monitor and report votes of
legislators that might represent conflicts of interest.
This serves
the dual purpose of putting lawmakers on notice to avoid wheeling and
dealing as well as giving voters perspective of who is using the public
trust to benefit themselves.
•
One person’s
benefit can be another’s burden.
Idaho now
can boast of having more than 70 different vehicle license plates,
according to the Idaho Department of Transportation.
Yep, in
fact, the number may be 77, many of them variations of a theme plate (such
as the wildlife plate).
Some plates
have been authorized to honor special groups ¾ Medal of Honor recipients,
Purple Heart awardees, former prisoners of war, Pearl Harbor survivor,
disabled veterans, etc.
But others
have been authorized to raise funds through special fees for programs and
groups ¾ such as for wildlife and the environment.
But pity
police officers on patrol that must check plates of vehicles they’ve
stopped for traffic violations.
It used to
be simple ¾ just rattle off a number.
But with
plates that combine numbers and special interest group icons, it means a
batch of separate data bases need to be checked.
•
With a
flourish, Homeland Security director Tom Ridge last month unveiled the
national alert system that ranks threats by colors, starting with green as
the lowest, followed by blue, yellow, orange and red as dangers intensify.
Ridge announced a "yellow" alert status, and it’s remained
there, as far as anyone knows.
Just try to
find out if the color code has changed. Certainly not on the Office of
Homeland Security’s Internet site, which features biographies of
President Bush and others, speeches by Ridge, and heaven knows what other
trivia ¾ but no news about current threats or alert status.
And even
when the "yellow" alert was issued, as usual there was no
information from Ridge on whether the alert applied to all 50 U.S. states
and not an inkling of what Americans needed to be on the alert about.
With such
skimpy information, cynics can be excused if they suspect that the Office
of Homeland Security is becoming another costly, officious federal
bureaucracy looking for reasons to justify its existence.