USFWS kills White
Hawk wolf pack
Pack preyed on a
sheep and two calves
By GREG
STAHL
Express Staff Writer
For the
second time since wolves were reintroduced to Idaho six years ago, a wolf
pack has been decimated in the East Fork of the Salmon River valley near
Clayton.
The entire
White Hawk Pack, including its alpha pair and eight subordinates, was shot
in federal control actions. Inside the span of a week, the pack preyed on
a sheep and two calves, each time resulting in increasingly severe
responses from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s Wildlife Services.
Two years
ago this month, members of the White Cloud Pack, which roamed the same
region, were killed and the pack disbanded after wolves preyed on calves
in the valley, southwest of Clayton.
Over the
weekend, the five remaining White Hawk Pack wolves were killed in response
to a private property livestock kill. Three White Hawk wolves were killed
after they preyed on a calf earlier in the week, and on April 2,, two were
killed after preying on a domestic sheep in the same area.
The pack’s
popular, and possibly pregnant, alpha female, a creamy-white wolf dubbed
Alabaster, is among the dead animals.
Wolf
advocates are upset.
Last
summer, from June through late September, 32 volunteers from seven states
joined in an effort to protect the White Hawk wolves from their natural
instincts in the Sawtooth Valley. Along with human hazing, radio-activated
guard boxes (RAG boxes), which are designed to frighten radio-collared
wolves using strobes and ear-piercing sounds, were deployed around grazing
and sleeping sheep.
Three miles
of fladry lines, which are designed to frighten wolves, were strung.
Transportable electric fencing was maintained.
"After
the Wolf Guardian project started, no more wolves were killed due to
depredation, and the sheep were safe," reported Cheri Beno, one of
the volunteers who worked to keep the wolves and sheep separate. "I’m
very proud of my involvement and of all those guardians who worked hard
and made a difference. They made it work."
But at the
news of last week’s lethal control actions, Beno, of Washington state,
said her stomach turned.
"In my
heart, I believe wolves everywhere deserve a fair shake, and that all
top-line predators belong in our world. Someone more intelligent and with
more far-seeing capabilities put them here in the first place. By far, man
is the worst predator of all."
However,
wolf advocate and Idaho Conservation League Central Idaho Director Linn
Kincannon, of Ketchum, said she sympathizes, to a degree, with the East
Fork ranchers.
"The
East Fork is a problem, because we’re talking about private land,"
she said. "Those ranchers have the right to protect their property.
But I think we need to find solutions other than wiping out whole packs.
This is unacceptable.
Lynne
Stone, executive director of the Boulder White Cloud Council, said she
laments that the entire Sawtooth National Recreation Area has nary a wolf
in it.
"Right
now, from Sunbeam to Stanley to Galena Summit, there might be two or three
stray wolves that have wandered in," she said. "They could have
darted them. They could have relocated them. My feeling is that the black
heart politicians and the groups like the Farm Bureau and cattlemen were
weighing in so heavily."
But the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services’s Idaho Wolf Recovery Coordinator,
Carter Niemeyer, said aversive measures failed with the White Hawk Pack
too many times and decisions were based on the packs repeated livestock
depredations.
"We
attempted to use many preventative measures with the White Hawk Pack,
including RAG boxes, helicopter hazing, electric fencing, ground pursuit
and harassment," he said. "These non-lethal means of control did
not deter the wolves’ persistent livestock depredation. We will continue
to use various non-lethal measures to control problem wolves, but the
reality is that chronic depredation incidents may result in the lethal
control of some gray wolves in Idaho."
Fish and
Wildlife is hoping that a combination of various measures, including
private landowner lethal take permits, will be successful in preventing
future depredations if or when wolves move back into the East Fork valley.
"In
this situation, the Service, Wildlife Services and the Nez Perce Tribe
believe that all reasonable efforts to use non-lethal means to discourage
depredations were exhausted," Niemeyer said.
The control
actions also prompted the Wolf Recovery Foundation to pull its donations
in Idaho and Montana of radio collars used to track wolves.
"The
Fish and Wildlife Service said the radio collars would protect wolves from
illegal killing," said WRF vice president Ralph Maughan, of
Pocatello. "But the collars have made legal killing far too easy a
solution for the government whenever there are minor livestock
problems."
Thirty-five
wolves were transplanted from Canada to Idaho in 1995 and 1996. In
December counts they had multiplied to 261 in 17 confirmed packs. By the
end of 2002, federal wolf managers estimate 500 wolves will be roaming the
mountains and valleys of Idaho, Yellowstone National Park and northwestern
Montana.
And
Niemeyer said most of Idaho’s wolves appear to have wintered well.
"We
feel that most of the pairs we identified last year are still
functional," he said. "In December, we identified 17 packs.
Fourteen of those pairs produced pups last year. Right now, I feel like we’re
going to have a few more breeding pairs this year than last year."
Fish and
Wildlife believes that 30 breeding pairs of wolves for three successive
years throughout Idaho, Montana and Wyoming will constitute a viable and
recovered wolf population. If current trends continue, removal of wolves
from the Endangered Species Act, could occur by the end of 2002 if the
three states have drafted adequate wolf recovery plans of their own.