Why you can’t
vote too
(Psst...it’s not
the People’s Choice Awards)
By DANA
DUGAN
Express Staff Writer
Sunday!
Sunday! At a television near you! The Oscars are coming. Get out your
trusty pen and check off your favorites. We all get to vote and not one of
our votes actually counts. Sounds a bit like Florida, no?
So who does
get to vote? I mean, outside those ubiquitous inter-office, emails and
home-viewing pools?
The Academy
of Motion Pictures and Sciences says that membership in the Academy is
"limited to those who have achieved the highest level of distinction
in the arts and sciences of motion pictures."
Current
there are 5,607 voting over-achieving members in 14 branches—Actors, Art
Directors, Cinematographers, Directors, Documentary, Executives, Film
Editors, Music, Producers, Public Relations, Short Films and Feature
Animation, Sound, Visual Effects, and Writers.
All very
well but there are plenty of mailroom geeks who get advance copies of
flicks or has-beens who live in Peoria, who are still members. So
what gives?
To get to
be a member in the first place someone in your appropriate branch must
submit your name to the Board of Governors for approval.
And while
members-at-large should be working in film production, there is no
separate branch for their particular craft. The lucky ones, are the life
members, so designated by unanimous vote of the Board of Governors and
having full privileges of membership, and no dues.
So, for the
Oscars, voting members make nominations, usually heavily promoted in the
industry rags. These nominations are restricted to voting by members of
the Academy branch concerned; directors, for instance, are the only
nominators for Achievement in Directing. (Wouldn’t it be more fun,
though, if Grips got to vote for directors, Best Boys for actresses, and
so forth?)
So when
people thank their peers—after lengthy thanks to high school drama
teachers and dog walkers—they mean it literally.
As with
every year, certain awards have already been announced well before the
Oscar air-date. Among them are Scientific and Technical Awards, Honorary
Awards, Special Achievement Awards and other special honors.
Chief among
these is the Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award, a bronze bust of the
legendary MGM producer, which is given to "a creative producer who
has been responsible for a consistently high quality of motion picture
production." It’s considered the most impressive award producer
might receive. However, this year….gasp…there is apparently no such
producer, and so no winner.
Then there
is the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award given to someone within the
industry whose humanitarian efforts have brought credit to the industry.
This year it goes to veteran director Arthur Hiller.
Not one of
his flicks—"The Out-of-Towners," "Plaza Suite,"
"Man of La Mancha," "The In-Laws"—is a true classic,
but hey, the guy has been involved in Hollywood and it’s charitable
achievements for eons. And in this case, that is what it’s all about.
A tad bit
more fun will be the two honorary awards which this year are being given
to Robert Redford and Sidney Poitier—good actors both who began their
working lives as hunky, pretty boys.
Poitier in
particular was a huge break-through African American actor, who was twice
nominated for Academy Awards. His first, in 1959, was for his leading role
in "The Defiant Ones," and the second, for which he won, in 1964
was for "Lilies in the Field." He is still the only African
American to ever win the Oscar in a leading role.
However,
much of his legend is based on starring roles in two 1960s gems, "To
Sir, With Love," and Spencer Tracy’s last flick "Guess Who’s
Coming to Dinner."
And what to
say of Bob Redford that is not already common knowledge? He was nominated
for "The Sting," won as a director for "Ordinary
People" and was nominated again for "Quiz Show. "
Not much
compares, in my humble opinion, with his performance as the cocky, sexy
outlaw in "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid," or his sophomore
directorial effort "Milargro Beanfield Wars." Besides his long
career, Redford is notably the creator of the Sundance Film Festival,
which has become a major showcase for independent film makers.
Not too
shabby for a pretty boy.
So what
about the juicy stuff? Will there be any streakers, as there were in 1974,
rejections like George C Scott’s in 1971 (for "Patton") and
Marlon Brando’s in 1973 (for "The Godfather") or one armed
push-ups by 71 year old Jack Palance (1991).
Will
Russell Crowe win two statuettes in a row and then offend his peers by not
saying thank you as he did during the SAG awards, or prove he’s
sensitive by reciting poetry as he did at the BAFTA awards only to reverse
that perception by cussing out and shoving a producer.
Imagine it
and it probably happened at one time in the long and illustrious history
of the Oscars. Since 1929, the industry that celebrates itself has
celebrated with aplomb, but only did they include us, the paying public,
in the fun when in 1940 during the war, they broadcast the show live on
the radio, with an address by President Roosevelt and surprise winners.
No matter
how you look at it, who votes or who wears what, ultimately the Oscar
voting process continues to be the most politically motivated fashion show
around, other than skating competitions, of course.
As the
great theatrical stage star—and non-Academy member—Tallulah Bankhead
once famously said, "The people who vote in that free-for-all don’t
know on which side their crêpes suzette are buttered."