Someplace else
No schools,
no parks—no kids. No housing—no workers. No habitat—no wildlife. No
hotel beds—no visitors, no businesses.
An
inconceivable scenario? Too wild for words? Yet it’s one that is
unfolding in front of our very eyes.
Sun Valley
residents defeated the city’s first public park a couple of years ago.
Now, the city is looking at a proposal to put a private elementary school
on the same property, a quiet draw between subdivisions of mostly empty
million-dollar houses.
The same
traffic-and-noise arguments opponents used against the park will be used
against the school. Opponents say the school should go someplace else.
Ketchum is
facing opposition to development on a city lot on Main Street that would
include 25 housing units workers could afford.
Opponents
say the property is too valuable to include housing. They say
housing—and the working people who live in it—should go someplace
else.
Blaine
County has slammed the door on at least three drafts of an ordinance that
would encourage development of affordable housing.
In the
meantime, housing costs continue to rise while workers look for someplace
else to live.
Visitors
aren’t faring any better. Ketchum has restricted the size of downtown
buildings to the point that it may be impossible to develop new hotels.
Small hotels are disappearing fast—remember the Christiania, the
Heidelberg, and the Alpenrose? Some day soon, visitors could be hard
pressed to find a pillow for a night or two.
Opponents
say large buildings should not be allowed anywhere. Visitors were not a
consideration when the restrictions were approved.
Even big
game animals are finding it hard to find a place to live. Valley residents
watched this winter while elk and deer tried vainly to find food in a
valley carpeted with subdivisions. They watched in horror as snowmobiles
were used to scare them away from tasty ornamental shrubs and trees.
Subdivision
residents said the elk and deer should go someplace else.
This raises
the question: Who or what should inhabit the valley?
Listening
to the public debate leads to some curious answers: People without
children, or people whose children can remain illiterate. People who live
without sports and without parks. Businesses that don’t need employees.
People who don’t need jobs and don’t need services. People who are not
visitors. Wildlife that can survive winter without food or water.
Sound
ludicrous? We think so, too, but this is "someplace else."
Surely, we can do better than this.